...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition >Effects of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat type chickens
【24h】

Effects of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat type chickens

机译:两种含有芽孢杆菌芽孢的益生菌添加剂对肉类鸡car体特性,血脂和盲肠挥发性脂肪酸的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of two commercially available probiotic additives, containing Bacillus spores, on carcass and meat characteristics, serum lipids and concentration of cecal volatile fatty acids of meat type chickens. Birds were fed regular corn-soy meal based feed (control), supplemented with additive A, containing 1.6 x 10(6) spores per gram of feed of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis (group A) or additive B, containing the same concentration of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi spores (group B). One hundred and twenty birds (20 per replicate) were slaughtered at the age of 55 days. Results showed that birds in group B had higher (p < 0.05) final body weight compared to birds from group A and higher carcass weights and yield percentages compared with control. Breasts and whole legs were also heavier in group B, compared to control, but not the yield. Group A had higher yield of wings and lower abdominal fat weight compared to group B (p < 0.05), but not compared with control. Total cholesterol was not affected by the dietary treatment, on contrary both probiotics elevated the LDL (p < 0.05) and lowered HDL cholesterol, thus unfavourably changed animal's blood serum cholesterol profile. Both probiotics influenced the cecal fermentation, which was observed as decrease in cecal concentrations of propionic, butyric, n-butyric and n-valeric acids, but the differences compared to control group were statistically significant for group A only. It was established that probiotic additive B was more effective regarding carcass and meat part weights than additive A, however the animals from group B also had more abdominal fat and their meat had significantly higher conductivity than control group, which is not considered as beneficial.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估两种商业上可获得的益生菌添加剂,包括芽孢杆菌芽孢,对肉类鸡的chicken体和肉的特性,血脂和盲肠挥发性脂肪酸浓度的影响。用常规的玉米豆粕粉饲料(对照)饲喂家禽,并添加添加剂A,每克含枯草芽孢杆菌和地衣芽孢杆菌(A组)或添加剂B的饲料每克含1.6 x 10(6)孢子,添加剂浓度相同蜡状芽孢杆菌变种丰子孢子(B组)。在55日龄时宰杀了120只鸟(每只重复20只)。结果表明,与对照组相比,B组的禽类的最终体重更高(p <0.05),and体重量和产率百分比更高。与对照组相比,B组的乳房和整条腿也较重,但产量却没有。与B组相比,A组的翅膀产量更高,腹部脂肪重量更低(p <0.05),但与对照组相比却没有。总胆固醇不受饮食治疗的影响,相反,两种益生菌均升高LDL(p <0.05)和降低HDL胆固醇,从而不利地改变了动物的血清胆固醇谱。两种益生菌均影响盲肠发酵,这被观察为盲肠中丙酸,丁酸,正丁酸和正戊酸浓度降低,但与对照组相比,差异仅在A组有统计学意义。已确定益生菌添加剂B在car体和肉的重量方面比添加剂A更有效,但是B组动物的腹部脂肪也更多,并且其肉类的电导率比对照组高,这被认为是无益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号