...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy vs cognitive behaviour therapy as a treatment for non-melancholic depression.
【24h】

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy vs cognitive behaviour therapy as a treatment for non-melancholic depression.

机译:以正念为基础的认知治疗与认知行为治疗相比,可以治疗非忧郁型抑郁症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To examine the comparative effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) as treatments for non-melancholic depression. METHOD: Participants who met criteria for a current episode of major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to either an 8-week MBCT (n=19) or CBT (n=26) group therapy condition. They were assessed at pre-treatment, 8-week post-group, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in pre- to post-group depression and anxiety scores in both treatment conditions and no significant differences between the two treatment conditions. However, significant differences were found when participants in the two treatment conditions were dichotomized into those with a history of four or more episodes of depression vs those with less than four. In the CBT condition, participants with four or more previous episodes of depression demonstrated greater improvements in depression than those with less than four previous episodes. No such differences were found in the MBCT treatment condition. No significant differences in depression or anxiety were found between the two treatment conditions at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes in each treatment condition, especially at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MBCT appears to be as effective as CBT in the treatment of current depression. However, CBT participants with four or more previous episodes of depression derived greater benefits at 8-week post-treatment than those with less than four episodes.
机译:目的:探讨以正念为基础的认知疗法(MBCT)和认知行为疗法(CBT)作为非忧郁性抑郁症治疗的比较效果。方法:将符合当前重度抑郁症发作标准的参与者随机分配为8周MBCT(n = 19)或CBT(n = 26)组治疗条件。在治疗前,组后8周以及6个月和12个月的随访中对他们进行了评估。结果:在两种治疗条件下,组前至后抑郁和焦虑评分均有显着改善,两种治疗条件之间无显着差异。但是,将两种治疗条件下的参与者分为患有抑郁症有四次或以上发作史的患者与少于四次的抑郁症史者有显着差异。在CBT情况下,与先前少于四次发作的参与者相比,先前经历过四次或更多次抑郁症的参与者表现出更大的抑郁改善。在MBCT治疗条件下未发现此类差异。在6和12个月的随访中,两种治疗条件之间的抑郁或焦虑无明显差异。局限性:每种治疗条件下的样本量均较小,尤其是在随访时。结论:MBCT在治疗当前抑郁症方面似乎与CBT一样有效。但是,与先前少于四次发作的参与者相比,先前经历过四次或更多发作的CBT参与者在治疗后8周可获得更大的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号