首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Incidence and Outcome of Surgical Procedures After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared With Those After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.
【24h】

Incidence and Outcome of Surgical Procedures After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared With Those After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.

机译:与经皮冠状动脉介入术后相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术后的外科手术发生率和结果:冠脉血运重建报告表明在京都PCI / CABG注册研究队列2中的结果研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background-: Noncardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported to be carrying high risk for both ischemic and bleeding complications. However, there has been no report comparing the incidence and outcomes of surgical procedures after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with those after PCI.Methods and Results-: Among 14 383 patients undergoing first coronary revascularization (PCI, n=12 207; CABG, n=2176) enrolled in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2, surgical procedures were performed more frequently after CABG (n=560) than after PCI (n=2398; cumulative 3-year incidence: 27% versus 22%; unadjusted P<0.0001), particularly <6 months of coronary revascularization. The risk for the primary ischemic outcome measure (death/myocardial infarction) at 30-day postsurgical procedures was not significantly different between the CABG and PCI groups (cumulative incidence: 3.1% versus 3.2%; unadjusted P=0.9; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.89; P=0.9). The risk for the primary bleeding outcome measure (moderate or severe bleeding by Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries classification) was lower in the CABG groups than in the PCI group (cumulative incidence: 1.3% versus 2.6%; unadjusted P=0.07; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.87; P=0.02). There were no interactions between the timing of surgery and the types of coronary revascularization (CABG/PCI) for both ischemic and bleeding outcomes.Conclusions-: Surgical procedures were performed significantly more frequently after CABG than after PCI, particularly <6 months after coronary revascularization. Surgical procedures after CABG as compared with those after PCI were associated with similar risk for ischemic events and lower risk for bleeding events, regardless of the timing after coronary revascularization.
机译:背景:据报道,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的非心脏手术对缺血和出血并发症均具有很高的风险。然而,目前尚无关于将冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)与PCI术后手术的发生率和结局进行比较的报道。方法与结果:在14 383例首次进行冠脉血运重建的患者中(n = 12 207; CABG ,n = 2176)参加了京都冠状动脉血运重建研究结果研究(CREDO-Kyoto)PCI / CABG Registry Cohort-2,CABG后(n = 560)的手术频率比PCI(n = 2398;累积)高3年发生率:27%比22%;未经调整的P <0.0001),尤其是<6个月的冠状动脉血运重建。在CABG组和PCI组之间,术后30天进行主要缺血性结局指标(死亡/心肌梗塞)的风险无显着差异(累计发生率:3.1%对3.2%;未调整P = 0.9;调整后危险比,0.97) ; 95%置信区间0.47-1.89; P = 0.9)。 CABG组初次出血预后指标(通过链激酶和组织纤溶酶原激活剂的总体利用导致的中度或重度出血,用于冠状动脉闭塞分类)的风险低于PCI组(累计发生率:1.3%比2.6%;未经调整) P = 0.07;调整后的危险比为0.36; 95%置信区间为0.12-0.87; P = 0.02)。缺血时间和出血结局在手术时机和冠状动脉血运重建类型(CABG / PCI)之间没有相互作用。结论-:CABG术后的手术频率明显高于PCI后,尤其是冠状动脉血运重建后<6个月。与冠状动脉血运重建后的时机无关,CABG术后与PCI术后的手术程序具有相似的缺血事件风险和较低的出血事件风险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号