首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the enduring value of Killip classification.
【24h】

Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the enduring value of Killip classification.

机译:体格检查对非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征心力衰竭的预后重要性:Killip分类的持久价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: In acute myocardial infarction, the presence and severity of heart failure at the time of initial presentation have been formally categorized by the Killip classification. Although well studied in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the prognostic importance of Killip classification in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes is not well established. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure analyzed according to Killip classification in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and to understand its predictive value relative to other variables. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From April 2001 to September 2003, We analyzed information from 26 090 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the GUSTO IIb, PURSUIT, PARAGON A, and PARAGON B trials. Demographic information was categorized by Killip class. Killip classes III and IV were combined into 1 category. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were developed to determine the prognostic importance of Killip classification in comparison with other variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Association between Killip classification and all-cause mortality at 30 days and 6 months. RESULTS: Patients in Killip class II (n = 2513) and III/IV (n = 390) were older than those in Killip class I (n = 23 187), with higher rates of diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, ST depression, and elevated cardiac enzymes (all P<.001). Higher Killip class was associated with higher mortality at 30 days (2.8% in Killip class I vs 8.8% in class II vs 14.4% in class III/IV; P<.001) and 6 months (5.0% vs 14.7% vs 23.0%, respectively; P<.001). Patients with Killip class II, III, or IV constituted 11% of the overall population but accounted for approximately 30% of the deaths at both time points. In multivariate analysis, Killip class III/IV was the most powerful predictor of mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.26; P<.001) and 6 months (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.63-2.75; P<.001). Killip class II was predictive of mortality at 30 days (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.44-2.09; P<.001) and 6 months (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.31-1.76; P<.001). Five factors-age, Killip classification, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and ST depression-provided more than 70% of the prognostic information for 30-day and 6-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Killip classification is a powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Age, Killip classification, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and ST depression should receive particular attention in the initial assessment of these patients.
机译:背景:在急性心肌梗死中,首次出现时心力衰竭的存在和严重程度已根据Killip分类法进行了正式分类。尽管在ST抬高型心肌梗塞中进行了充分的研究,但Killip分类在非ST抬高型急性冠脉综合征中的预后重要性尚不明确。目的:确定在非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征中根据Killip分类分析的体检对心力衰竭的预后重要性,并了解其相对于其他变量的预测价值。设计,地点和患者:从2001年4月到2003年9月,我们分析了来自GUSTO IIb,PURSUIT,PARAGON A和PARAGON B试验的26 090例非ST抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的信息。人口统计信息按Killip类分类。基利卜的第三和第四级被归为一类。建立了多变量Cox比例风险模型,以确定Killip分类与其他变量相比对预后的重要性。主要观察指标:基利分类和30天和6个月全因死亡率之间的关联。结果:Killip II类(n = 2513)和III / IV(n = 390)的患者年龄大于Killip I类(n = 23 187),具有较高的糖尿病发生率,先前的心肌梗塞,ST抑郁和心脏酶升高(所有P <.001)。较高的Killip等级与30天时较高的死亡率相关(I类的Killip等级为2.8%,II类的为8.8%,III / IV类的为14.4%; P <.001)和6个月时的死亡率较高(5.0%的14.7%与23.0% ,分别为P <.001)。 Killip II,III或IV级患者占总人口的11%,但在两个时间点约占死亡人数的30%。在多变量分析中,Killip III / IV级是30天死亡率(危险比[HR],2.35; 95%置信区间[CI],1.69-3.26; P <.001)和6个月(HR)的最有力预测指标,2.12; 95%CI,1.63-2.75; P <.001)。 Killip II类可预测30天(HR,1.73; 95%CI,1.44-2.09; P <.001)和6个月(HR,1.52; 95%CI,1.31-1.76; P <.001)的死亡率。年龄,Killip分类,心率,收缩压和ST抑郁五个因素为30天和6个月死亡率提供了超过70%的预后信息。结论:Killip分类法是非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者全因死亡率的有力独立预测因子。在对这些患者进行初步评估时,应特别注意年龄,基利分类,心率,收缩压和ST抑郁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号