首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.
【24h】

Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

机译:术中胆管造影术和胆囊切除术中胆总管损伤的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) may decrease the risk of common bile duct (CBD) injury during cholecystectomy by helping to avoid misidentification of the CBD. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of IOC use and CBD injury while controlling for patient and surgeon characteristics.Design, Setting, and PATIENTS: Retrospective nationwide cohort analysis of Medicare patients undergoing cholecystectomy from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 1999. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes from the Medicare Part B depository. Common bile duct injury was defined by a second surgical procedure to repair the CBD injury within 1 year of cholecystectomy. Surgeon demographic features were obtained from matching the Medicare Part B data to the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Frequency of CBD injury in patients who did and did not have IOC performed during cholecystectomy, controlling for patient-level (age, sex, race, andcase complexity) and surgeon-level (surgeon's age, sex, race, year of surgical procedure, case order, percentage of IOC use in prior surgical procedures, years in medical practice, board certification, and specialization) factors. RESULTS: The database search identified 1 570 361 cholecystectomies and 7911 CBD injuries (0.5%). Common bile duct injury was found in 2380 (0.39%) of 613 706 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with IOC and in 5531 (0.58%) of 956 655 patients undergoing cholecystectomy without IOC (unadjusted relative risk, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-1.57). After controlling for patient-level factors and surgeon-level factors, the risk of injury was increased when IOC was not used (adjusted relative risk, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.28). While surgeons performing IOCs routinely had a lower rate of CBD injuries than those who did not, this difference disappeared when IOC was not used. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Medicare patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the 1990s, the riskof CBD injury was significantly higher when IOC was not used. Although IOCs may not prevent all CBD injuries, this study suggests that the routine use of IOC may decrease the rate of CBD injury.
机译:背景:术中胆管造影术(IOC)可通过避免避免对CBD的错误识别来降低胆囊切除术中胆总管(CBD)损伤的风险。目的:在控制患者和外科医生特征的同时,描述使用IOC与CBD损伤的关系。设计,背景和患者:对1992年1月1日至1999年12月31日接受胆囊切除术的Medicare患者进行的回顾性全国队列研究。使用Medicare B部分保管处的现行程序术语代码进行识别。胆总管切除术定义为在胆囊切除术后1年内修复CBD损伤的第二次外科手术定义胆总管损伤。通过将Medicare B部分数据与美国医学会医师主文件数据库进行匹配,可以获得外科医生的人口统计学特征。主要观察指标:在胆囊切除术中进行和未进行IOC的患者中CBD受伤的频率,控制患者水平(年龄,性别,种族和病例的复杂性)和外科医生水平(外科医生的年龄,性别,种族,年份)。手术程序,病例顺序,先前手术程序中使用IOC的百分比,医疗实践年限,董事会认证和专业化因素)。结果:数据库搜索确定了1 570 361例胆囊切除术和7911例CBD损伤(0.5%)。在613706例接受IOC胆囊切除术的患者中,有2380例(0.39%)和956 655例未进行IOC胆囊切除术的患者的5531例(0.58%)发现了胆总管损伤(相对危险度为1.49; 95%置信区间为1.42-1.57 )。在控制了患者水平因素和外科医生水平因素之后,不使用IOC时受伤的风险增加了(调整后的相对危险度为1.71; 95%的置信区间为1.38-2.28)。尽管进行IOC的外科医生通常比未进行IOC的外科医生的CBD受伤率低,但是当不使用IOC时,这种差异消失了。结论:在这项对1990年代进行胆囊切除术的Medicare患者的研究中,不使用IOC时CBD损伤的风险明显更高。尽管IOC不能预防所有CBD损伤,但这项研究表明,常规使用IOC可能会降低CBD损伤的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号