首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial (see comments)
【24h】

Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial (see comments)

机译:在疗养院中预先实施指导计划的系统实施:一项随机对照试验(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Although advance directives are commonly used in the community, little is known about the effects of their systematic implementation. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of systematically implementing an advance directive in nursing homes on patient and family satisfaction with involvement in decision making and on health care costs. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted June 1, 1994, to August 31, 1998. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1292 residents in 6 Ontario nursing homes with more than 100 residents each. INTERVENTION: The Let Me Decide advance directive program included educating staff in local hospitals and nursing homes, residents, and families about advance directives and offering competent residents or next-of-kin of mentally incompetent residents an advance directive that provided a range of health care choices for life-threatening illness, cardiac arrest, and nutrition. The 6 nursing homes were pair-matched on key characteristics, and 1 home per pair was randomized to take part in the program. Control nursing homes continued with prior policies concerning advance directives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Residents' and families' satisfaction with health care and health care services utilization over 18 months, compared between intervention and control nursing homes. RESULTS: Of 527 participating residents in intervention nursing homes, 49% of competent residents and 78% of families of incompetent residents completed advance directives. Satisfaction was not significantly different in intervention and control nursing homes. The mean difference (scale, 1-7) between intervention and control homes was -0.16 (95 % confidence interval [CI], -0.41 to 0.10) for competent residents and 0.07 (95% CI, -0.08 to 0.23) for families of incompetent residents. Intervention nursing homes reported fewer hospitalizations per resident (mean, 0.27 vs 0.48; P = .001) and less resource use (average total cost per patient, Can
机译:语境:尽管提前指示在社区中普遍使用,但对其系统实施的影响知之甚少。目的:研究在养老院中系统地执行预先医疗指示对患者和家庭在决策中的满意度以及对医疗费用的影响。设计:1994年6月1日至1998年8月31日进行的随机对照试验。地点和参加者:安大略省6个疗养院共有1292名居民,每个居民100多名。干预:“让我决定”预先指示计划包括对当地医院和疗养院,居民和家庭中的员工进行预先指示教育,并向有能力的居民或精神上无行为能力的居民的近亲提供提供一系列医疗保健的预先指示危及生命的疾病,心脏骤停和营养的多种选择。对6个疗养院的主要特征进行了配对,每对中随机分配了1个疗养院参加该计划。控制疗养院继续执行有关预先医疗指示的先前政策。主要观察指标:与干预和控制性疗养院相比,居民和家庭对18个月以上的医疗保健和医疗服务利用率感到满意。结果:在527名参与干预性疗养院的居民中,有49%的合格居民和78%的无能力居民家庭完成了预先指示。干预和控制疗养院的满意度没有显着差异。合格居民的干预房和对照房的平均差(规模为1-7)为-0.16(95%置信区间[CI],-0.41至0.10),而有住房的家庭为0.07(95%CI,-0.08至0.23)。无能的居民。干预性疗养院报告的每位住院病人更少(平均0.27 vs 0.48; P = .001),资源使用更少(每位患者的平均总费用,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号