首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial.

机译:外科口罩与N95呼吸器在医护人员中预防流感的作用:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Data about the effectiveness of the surgical mask compared with the N95 respirator for protecting health care workers against influenza are sparse. Given the likelihood that N95 respirators will be in short supply during a pandemic and not available in many countries, knowing the effectiveness of the surgical mask is of public health importance. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical mask with the N95 respirator in protecting health care workers against influenza. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Noninferiority randomized controlled trial of 446 nurses in emergency departments, medical units, and pediatric units in 8 tertiary care Ontario hospitals. INTERVENTION: Assignment to either a fit-tested N95 respirator or a surgical mask when providing care to patients with febrile respiratory illness during the 2008-2009 influenza season. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza measured by polymerase chain reaction or a 4-fold rise in hemagglutinin titers. Effectiveness of the surgical mask was assessed as noninferiority of the surgical mask compared with the N95 respirator. The criterion for noninferiority was met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the reduction in incidence (N95 respirator minus surgical group) was greater than -9%. RESULTS: Between September 23, 2008, and December 8, 2008, 478 nurses were assessed for eligibility and 446 nurses were enrolled and randomly assigned the intervention; 225 were allocated to receive surgical masks and 221 to N95 respirators. Influenza infection occurred in 50 nurses (23.6%) in the surgical mask group and in 48 (22.9%) in the N95 respirator group (absolute risk difference, -0.73%; 95% CI, -8.8% to 7.3%; P = .86), the lower confidence limit being inside the noninferiority limit of -9%. CONCLUSION: Among nurses in Ontario tertiary care hospitals, use of a surgical mask compared with an N95 respirator resulted in noninferior rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00756574
机译:背景:与N95口罩相比,手术口罩在防止医护人员感染流感方面的有效性的数据很少。鉴于大流行期间N95呼吸器可能会供不应求,而且在许多国家/地区都无法使用,因此知道手术口罩的有效性对公共卫生至关重要。目的:将手术口罩与N95呼吸器进行比较,以保护医护人员免受流感的侵袭。设计,地点和参与者:安大略省8所三级医院的急诊科,医疗科和儿科科的446名护士的非劣效性随机对照试验。干预:在2008-2009流感季节期间为发热性呼吸道疾病患者提供护理时,请分配经过合适测试的N95呼吸器或口罩。主要观察指标:主要结果是通过聚合酶链反应或血凝素滴度上升4倍测定的实验室确诊的流感。手术口罩的有效性被评估为与N95呼吸器相比,手术口罩的非劣质性。如果降低发病率(N95呼吸器减去手术组)的95%置信区间(CI)的下限大于-9%,则满足非自卑的标准。结果:在2008年9月23日至2008年12月8日之间,对478名护士进行了资格评估,并招募了446名护士并随机分配了干预措施。分配了225个接收口罩和221到N95呼吸器。口罩组的50名护士(23.6%)和N95呼吸器组的48名(22.9%)发生了流感感染(绝对风险差异为-0.73%; 95%CI为-8.8%至7.3%; P =。 86),下置信限在-9%的非劣效限内。结论:在安大略省三级医院的护士中,与N95口罩相比,使用外科口罩会导致实验室确诊流感的发生率不亚于其他水平。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00756574

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号