首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Late vs early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.
【24h】

Late vs early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.

机译:足月新生儿的晚期与早期脐带夹持:对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: With few exceptions, the umbilical cord of every newborn is clamped and cut at birth, yet the optimal timing for this intervention remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the potential benefits and harms of late vs early cord clamping in term infants. DATA SOURCES: Search of 6 electronic databases (on November 15, 2006, starting from the beginning of each): the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Neonatal Group trials register, the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINHAL; hand search of secondary references in relevant studies; and contact of investigators about relevant published research. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled trials comparing late vs early cord clamping following birth in infants born at 37 or more weeks' gestation. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data for outcomes of interest: infant hematologic status; iron status; and risk of adverse events such as jaundice, polycythemia, and respiratory distress. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis included 15 controlled trials (1912 newborns). Late cord clamping was delayed for at least 2 minutes (n = 1001 newborns), while early clamping in most trials (n = 911 newborns) was performed immediately after birth. Benefits over ages 2 to 6 months associated with late cord clamping include improved hematologic status measured as hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.70%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00%-5.40%); iron status as measured by ferritin concentration (WMD, 17.89; 95% CI, 16.58-19.21) and stored iron (WMD, 19.90; 95% CI, 7.67-32.13); and a clinically important reduction in the risk of anemia (relative risk (RR), 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.70). Neonates with late clamping were at increased risk of experiencing asymptomatic polycythemia (7 studies [403 neonates]: RR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.11-13.21; 2 high-quality studies only [281 infants]: RR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.00-15.36). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates for a minimum of 2 minutes following birth is beneficial to the newborn, extending into infancy. Although there was an increase in polycythemia among infants in whom cord clamping was delayed, this condition appeared to be benign.
机译:背景:除少数例外,每个新生儿的脐带在出生时都会被夹住并切断,但这种干预的最佳时机仍存在争议。目的:比较晚期和早期脐带夹闭在足月儿中的潜在利弊。数据来源:搜索6个电子数据库(从每个数据库开始,于2006年11月15日开始):Cochrane妊娠和分娩组试验注册,Cochrane新生儿组试验注册,Cochrane库,MEDLINE,EMBASE和CINHAL;手工搜索相关研究中的二级参考文献;以及有关相关已发表研究的调查人员联系。研究选择:对照试验比较了妊娠37周或以上的婴儿出生后晚期与早期脐带夹紧的比较。数据提取:两名评价员独立评估了试验的资格和质量,并提取了相关结果的数据:婴儿血液学状况;铁状态以及发生黄疸,红细胞增多症和呼吸窘迫等不良事件的风险。数据综合:荟萃分析包括15项对照试验(1912例新生儿)。晚期钳夹至少延迟2分钟(n = 1001新生儿),而大多数试验(n = 911新生儿)中的早期钳紧是在出生后立即进行的。 2至6个月以上与晚期脐带夹闭相关的益处包括改善的血液学状况(以血细胞比容计)(加权平均差异[WMD]为3.70%; 95%置信区间[CI]为2.00%-5.40%);通过铁蛋白浓度(WMD,17.89; 95%CI,16.58-19.21)和储存的铁(WMD,19.90; 95%CI,7.67-32.13)测量铁的状态;以及具有临床意义的贫血风险降低(相对风险(RR),0.53; 95%CI,0.40-0.70)。钳夹较晚的新生儿患无症状性红细胞增多症的风险增加(7项研究[403新生儿]:RR,3.82; 95%CI,1.11-13.21;仅两项高质量研究[281婴儿]:RR,3.91; 95%CI ,1.00-15.36)。结论:足月新生儿在出生后至少延迟2分钟夹紧脐带对新生儿有益,并延长到婴儿期。尽管延迟了脐带夹持的婴儿的红细胞增多症有所增加,但这种情况似乎是良性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号