首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial.

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对心肌梗死后无症状缺血的影响:SWISSI II随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: The effect of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the long-term prognosis of patients with silent ischemia after a myocardial infarction (MI) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether PCI compared with drug therapy improves long-term outcome of asymptomatic patients with silent ischemia after an MI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, unblinded, controlled trial (Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischemia Type II [SWISSI II]) conducted from May 2, 1991, to February 25, 1997, at 3 public hospitals in Switzerland of 201 patients with a recent MI, silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease. Follow-up ended on May 23, 2006. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention aimed at full revascularization (n = 96) or intensive anti-ischemic drug therapy (n = 105). All patients received 100 mg/d of aspirin and a statin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival free of major adverse cardiac events defined as cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and/or symptom-driven revascularization. Secondary measures included exercise-induced ischemia and resting left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up. RESULTS: During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.2 (2.6) years, 27 major adverse cardiac events occurred in the PCI group and 67 events occurred in the anti-ischemic drug therapy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.55; P<.001), which corresponds to an absolute event reduction of 6.3% per year (95% confidence interval, 3.7%-8.9%; P<.001). Patients in the PCI group had lower rates of ischemia (11.6% vs 28.9% in patients in the drug therapy group at final follow-up; P = .03) despite fewer drugs. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained preserved in PCI patients (mean [SD] of 53.9% [9.9%] at baseline to 55.6% [8.1%] at final follow-up) and decreased significantly (P<.001) in drug therapy patients (mean [SD] of 59.7% [11.8%] at baseline to 48.8% [7.9%] at final follow-up). CONCLUSION: Among patients with recent MI,silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, PCI compared with anti-ischemic drug therapy reduced the long-term risk of major cardiac events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00387231.
机译:背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对心肌梗死(MI)后无症状性缺血患者的长期预后的影响尚不清楚。目的:确定PCI与药物治疗相比是否能改善无症状缺血性心肌梗死无症状患者的长期预后。设计,地点和参与者:1991年5月2日至1997年2月25日在瑞士的3所公立医院进行的随机,无盲,对照试验(瑞士对II型沉默缺血的瑞士干预研究[SWISSI II]),对201名患者进行了研究。最近的心肌梗死,通过压力显像验证了无症状的心肌缺血,以及1或2支冠状动脉疾病。随访于2006年5月23日结束。干预:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗旨在完全血运重建(n = 96)或强化抗缺血药物治疗(n = 105)。所有患者均接受100 mg / d的阿司匹林和他汀类药物。主要观察指标:无严重不良心脏事件的生存,这些不良事件定义为心脏死亡,非致死性心肌梗死和/或症状驱动的血运重建。次要措施包括运动诱发的缺血和随访期间静息的左心室射血分数。结果:在10.2(2.6)年的平均(SD)随访期间,PCI组发生了27次主要不良心脏事件,抗缺血药物治疗组发生了67次重大事件(调整后的危险比为0.33; 95%的置信度)时间间隔为0.20-0.55; P <.001),相当于每年发生的绝对事件减少6.3%(95%置信区间为3.7%-8.9%; P <.001)。尽管药物较少,但PCI组患者的局部缺血率较低(在最终随访时,药物治疗组的患者为11.6%,而药物治疗组的患者为28.9%; P = .03)。左心室射血分数在PCI患者中保持不变(平均[SD]在基线时为53.9%[9.9%],在最终随访时为55.6%[8.1%]),并且在药物治疗患者中显着降低(P <.001)(基线时平均[SD]为59.7%[11.8%],最终随访时为48.8%[7.9%])。结论:在近期心肌梗死,通过应力成像证实的静默性心肌缺血以及1或2支冠状动脉疾病的患者中,PCI与抗缺血药物治疗相比可降低发生重大心脏事件的长期风险。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00387231。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号