首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis.

机译:罗格列酮对心血管事件的长期风险:一项荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Recent reports of serious adverse events with rosiglitazone use have raised questions about whether the evidence of harm justifies its use for treatment of type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the long-term cardiovascular risks of rosiglitazone, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, the GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials register, the US Food and Drug Administration Web site, and product information sheets for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in English through May 2007. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials of rosiglitazone for prevention or treatment of type 2 diabetes, had at least 12 months of follow-up, and monitored cardiovascular adverse events and provided numerical data on all adverse events. Four studies were included after detailed screening of 140 trials for cardiovascular events. DATA EXTRACTION: Relative risks (RRs) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality were estimated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials (n = 14 291, including 6421 receiving rosiglitazone and 7870 receiving control therapy, with a duration of follow-up of 1-4 years). RESULTS: Rosiglitazone significantly increased the risk of myocardial infarction (n = 94/6421 vs 83/7870; RR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.91; P = .02) and heart failure (n = 102/6421 vs 62/7870; RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.52-2.88; P < .001) without a significant increase in risk of cardiovascular mortality (n = 59/6421 vs 72/7870; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.26; P = .53). There was no evidence of substantial heterogeneity among the trials for these end points (I(2) = 0% for myocardial infarction, 18% for heart failure, and 0% for cardiovascular mortality). CONCLUSION: Among patients with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone use for at least 12 months is associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure, without a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.
机译:背景:最近关于罗格列酮使用引起严重不良事件的报道引起了人们的疑问,即损害的证据是否足以证明其可用于治疗2型糖尿病。目的:系统评价罗格列酮的长期心血管风险,包括心肌梗塞,心力衰竭和心血管死亡率。数据来源:我们搜索了MEDLINE,葛兰素史克(GlaxoSmithKline)临床试验注册资料,美国食品和药物管理局(US Food and Drug Administration)网站以及产品信息表,以随机对照试验,系统评价和荟萃分析的形式发布了英语,直至2007年5月。如果他们是罗格列酮预防或治疗2型糖尿病的随机对照试验,至少进行了12个月的随访并监测了心血管不良事件并提供了所有不良事件的数值数据,则将其纳入研究。在详细筛选140项心血管事件试验后,纳入了四项研究。数据提取:采用4项随机对照试验(n = 14 291,包括罗格列酮接受6421和7870接受对照治疗)的固定效应荟萃分析,评估了心肌梗塞,心力衰竭和心血管疾病死亡率的相对风险(RRs)。随访时间为1-4年)。结果:罗格列酮显着增加了心肌梗塞的风险(n = 94/6421 vs 83/7870; RR,1.42; 95%置信区间[CI],1.06-1.91; P = .02)和心力衰竭(n = 102 / 6421 vs 62/7870; RR,2.09; 95%CI,1.52-2.88; P <.001)而没有显着增加心血管死亡率的风险(n = 59/6421 vs 72/7870; RR,0.90; 95%CI ,0.63-1.26; P = .53)。在这些试验中,没有证据表明这些终点存在实质性异质性(心肌梗塞I(2)= 0%,心力衰竭18%,心血管死亡率0%)。结论:在糖耐量受损或2型糖尿病患者中,使用罗格列酮至少12个月会显着增加心肌梗塞和心力衰竭的风险,而不会显着增加心血管死亡的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号