...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.
【24h】

Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.

机译:在评估可疑急性冠脉综合征患者中胸痛史的价值和局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: The chest pain history, physical examination, determination of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors, and the initial electrocardiogram compose the information immediately available to clinicians to help determine the probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with chest pain. However, conflicting data exist about the usefulness of the chest pain history and which components are most useful. OBJECTIVE: To identify the elements of the chest pain history that may be most helpful to the clinician in identifying ACS in patients presenting with chest pain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and Ovid were searched from 1970 to September 2005 by using specific key words and Medical Subject Heading terms. Reference lists of these articles and current cardiology textbooks were also consulted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Certain chest pain characteristics decrease the likelihood of ACS or AMI, namely, pain that is stabbing, pleuritic, positional, or reproducible by palpation (likelihood ratios [LRs] 0.2-0.3). Conversely, chest pain that radiates to one shoulder or both shoulders or arms or is precipitated by exertion is associated with LRs (2.3-4.7) that increase the likelihood of ACS. The chest pain history itself has not proven to be a powerful enough predictive tool to obviate the need for at least some diagnostic testing. Combinations of elements of the chest pain history with other initially available information, such as a history of CAD, have identified certain groups that may be safe for discharge without further evaluation, but further study is needed before such a recommendation can be considered reasonable. CONCLUSION: Although certain elements of the chest pain history are associated with increased or decreased likelihoods of a diagnosis of ACS or AMI, none of them alone or in combination identify a group of patients that can be safely discharged without further diagnostic testing.
机译:背景:胸痛史,体格检查,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)危险因素的确定以及最初的心电图组成了可立即提供给临床医生的信息,以帮助确定急性心肌梗塞(AMI)或急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的可能性)胸痛患者。但是,关于胸痛史的用处以及哪些成分最有用的数据存在矛盾。目的:确定可能对临床医生最有帮助的胸痛患者ACS鉴别的胸痛史要素。证据获取:从1970年到2005年9月,使用特定的关键词和医学主题词搜索了MEDLINE和Ovid。还查阅了这些文章的参考清单和当前的心脏病学教科书。证据综合:某些胸痛特征降低了ACS或AMI的可能性,即刺痛,胸膜炎,位置性或触诊可复制的疼痛(似然比[LRs]为0.2-0.3)。相反,辐射到一个肩膀或两个肩膀或手臂或因运动而加剧的胸痛与增加ACS可能性的LR(2.3-4.7)有关。胸痛史本身并未被证明是足够强大的预测工具,可以避免至少进行一些诊断测试。结合胸痛史要素和其他最初可获得的信息(如CAD史),已经确定了某些可以安全出院的人群,无需进一步评估,但在认为这样的建议合理之前还需要进一步研究。结论:尽管胸痛史的某些因素与诊断ACS或AMI的可能性增加或降低有关,但没有一个人单独或结合使用它们可以确定一组无需进一步诊断检查即可安全出院的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号