首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Regionalization of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and implications for patient travel distance.
【24h】

Regionalization of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and implications for patient travel distance.

机译:经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的区域化及其对患者出行距离的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Minimum procedure volume thresholds have been proposed to improve outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). How regionalization policies would affect patient travel distances is not known. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of regionalization of PTCA on patient travel distances. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of discharge records, which were examined to determine hospital and operator procedure volumes, of 97,401 patients undergoing PTCA in New York, New Jersey, and Florida in 2001. Travel distances were measured at baseline and under 2 regionalization scenarios in which hospital-operator pairs not meeting minimum volume standards stopped providing services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Observed and expected patient travel distances, and risk-adjusted mortality. RESULTS: With a minimum volume standard of 175 per operator and 400 per hospital (class 1), 25% of patients had a shorter travel distance, 10% had a longer traveldistance, and 65% experienced no change. Most patients with longer travel distances under this standard would travel no more than 25 miles farther, and most patients with shorter travel distances would save no more than 10 miles. With a minimum volume standard of 75 per operator and 400 per hospital (class 2), 11% of patients had a shorter travel distance, 2% had a longer travel distance, and 87% experienced no change. Under both standards, less than 1% of patients would travel more than 50 miles farther than their observed travel distance. Risk-adjusted mortality was higher for lower-volume hospital-operator pairs (1.2% for class 3 vs 0.9% for class 2 and 0.8% for class 1; P<.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: Regionalization of PTCA would not increase travel distance for most patients; however, potential costs of regionalization not related to travel must be examined before such policies can be recommended.
机译:背景:提出了最小手术量阈值,以改善接受经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)的患者的预后。区域政策如何影响患者的出行距离尚不清楚。目的:探讨PTCA区域化对患者出行距离的影响。设计,地点和参与者:2001年在纽约,新泽西和佛罗里达进行的PTCA病人97,401名患者的出院记录回顾性队列研究,通过检查以确定医院和操作者的手术量。在2种区域化方案中,不符合最低数量标准的医务人员停止提供服务。主要观察指标:观察和预期的患者出诊距离,以及风险调整后的死亡率。结果:每位操作员的最低体积标准为175,每家医院为400(第一类),25%的患者旅行距离较短,10%的患者旅行距离较长,65%的患者没有变化。在此标准下,大多数具有较长行进距离的患者将行进不超过25英里,而大多数具有较短行进距离的患者将节省不超过10英里。每个操作者的最低体积标准为75,每个医院为400(第二级),11%的患者具有较短的行进距离,2%的患者具有较长的行进距离,而87%的患者则没有变化。在这两个标准下,不到1%的患者会比观察到的距离远超过50英里。较小数量的医院-手术对的风险调整后死亡率较高(第3类为1.2%,第2类为0.9%,第1类为0.8%;两个比较均P <.001)。结论:PTCA的区域化不会增加大多数患者的出行距离。但是,在建议此类政策之前,必须检查与旅行无关的潜在区域成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号