首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Response to smallpox vaccine in persons immunized in the distant past.
【24h】

Response to smallpox vaccine in persons immunized in the distant past.

机译:远古时代免疫的人对天花疫苗的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: There is renewed interest in use of smallpox vaccine due to the potential for a bioterrorist attack. This would involve vaccinating health care workers who were previously vaccinated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of diluted vaccinia virus in vaccination of previously vaccinated (non-naive) participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty non-naive participants, aged 32 to 60 years, were randomized in a single-blinded study to receive either undiluted or diluted (1:3.2, 1:10, or 1:32) doses of smallpox vaccine. A comparison group, aged 18 to 31 years, of 10 vaccinia-naive participants received undiluted vaccine. Participants were enrolled between April 1 and May 15, 2002, at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit at Saint Louis University, St Louis, Mo. INTERVENTION: Smallpox vaccine was administered by scarification using 15 skin punctures in the deltoid region of the arm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of a major reaction, defined as a vesicular or pustular lesion or area of palpable induration surrounding a central lesion following vaccination, and measures of viral shedding and antibody titers. RESULTS: Initial vaccination resulted in a major reaction in 64 of 80 non-naive participants. Ninety-five percent of non-naive participants had major reactions in the undiluted group, 90% in the 1:3.2 dilution group, 81% in the 1:10 dilution group, and 52.6% in the 1:32 dilution group. All (n = 10) of the vaccinia-naive participants had major reactions. Compared with vaccinia-naive participants, non-naive participants had significantly smaller skin lesions (P =.04) and significantly less incidence of fever (P .02). Preexisting antibody was present in 76 of 80 non-naive participants. Antibody responses were significantly higher and occurred more rapidly in the non-naive participants compared with the vaccinia-naive participants (P =.002 for day 28 and P =.003 for 6 months). Vaccinia-naive participants shed virus from the vaccination site 2 to 6 days longer and had significantly higher peak mean viral titers when compared with the non-naive participants (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: Previously vaccinated persons can be successfully revaccinated with diluted (
机译:背景:由于天花疫苗可能引起生物恐怖袭击,因此人们对天花疫苗的使用重新产生了兴趣。这将涉及给以前接种过疫苗的医护人员接种疫苗。目的:评估稀释牛痘病毒在以前接种过的(非初次接种)参与者的疫苗接种中的使用。设计,地点和参与者:80名32至60岁的非初次参加者,在单盲研究中随机分配,以接受未稀释或稀释(1:3.2、1:10或1:32)天花剂量疫苗。年龄在18至31岁之间的10名未接种痘苗的参与者的对照组接受了未稀释的疫苗。参与者于2002年4月1日至5月15日在美国密苏里州圣路易斯市圣路易斯大学国家过敏和传染病研究所疫苗和治疗评估部门参加。干预:天花疫苗是通过划痕法使用15种皮肤穿刺术进行的。手臂的三角肌区域。主要观察指标:出现重大反应的定义为:接种疫苗后中央病变周围的水疱或脓疱病变或可触及的硬结区域,以及病毒脱落和抗体滴度的度量。结果:最初的疫苗接种导致80位非初次参加者中的64位发生了重大反应。 95%的非天真的参与者在未稀释组中有重大反应,在1:3.2稀释组中占90%,在1:10稀释组中占81%,在1:32稀释组中占52.6%。所有(n = 10)初次接种牛痘的参与者均出现重大反应。与未接种痘苗的参与者相比,未初次接种的参与者的皮肤病变明显较小(P = .04),发烧的发生率也明显较低(P .02)。 80名非初次参加试验的参与者中有76名存在预先存在的抗体。与未接种痘苗的参与者相比,非未接种参与者的抗体应答显着更高,发生速度也更快(第28天的P = .002和6个月的P = .003)。与未接受过疫苗接种的参与者相比,未接受过疫苗接种的参与者从疫苗接种部位排出病毒的时间长了2至6天,并且峰值平均病毒滴度明显更高(P = .002)。结论:以前接种过疫苗的人可以成功地用稀释的(<或= 1:10)天花疫苗重新接种。与未接种牛痘的参与者相比,在非初次接种参与者的这项研究中观察到的不良反应更少,这可能是由于免疫记忆所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号