...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA surgery >Effect of insurance expansion on utilization of inpatient surgery
【24h】

Effect of insurance expansion on utilization of inpatient surgery

机译:保险扩展对住院手术利用率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE Enhanced access to preventive and primary care services is a primary focus of the Affordable Care Act, but the potential effect of this law on surgical care is not well defined. OBJECTIVE To estimate the differential effect of insurance expansion on utilization of discretionary vs nondiscretionary inpatient surgery with Massachusetts health care reform as a natural experimental condition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We used the state inpatient databases from Massachusetts and 2 control states (New Jersey and New York) to identify nonelderly adult patients (aged 19-64 years) who underwent discretionary vs nondiscretionary surgical procedures from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2010. We defined discretionary surgery as elective, preference-sensitive procedures (eg, joint replacement and back surgery) and nondiscretionary surgery as imperative and potentially life-saving procedures (eg, cancer surgery and hip fracture repair). EXPOSURE All surgical procedures in the study and control populations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Using July 1, 2007, as the transition point between the prereform and postreform periods, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis to estimate the effect of insurance expansion on rates of discretionary and nondiscretionary surgical procedures in the entire study population and for subgroups defined by race, income, and insurance status.We then extrapolated our results from Massachusetts to the entire US population. RESULTS We identified a total of 836 311 surgical procedures during the study period. Insurance expansion was associated with a 9.3% increase in the use of discretionary surgery in Massachusetts (P = .02). Conversely, the rate of nondiscretionary surgery decreased by 4.5%(P = .009).We found similar effects for discretionary surgery in all subgroups, with the greatest increase observed for nonwhite participants (19.9%[P < .001]). Based on the findings in Massachusetts, we estimated that full implementation of national insurance expansion would yield an additional 465 934 discretionary surgical procedures by 2017. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Insurance expansion in Massachusetts was associated with increased rates of discretionary surgery and a concurrent decrease in rates of nondiscretionary surgery. If similar changes are seen nationally under the Affordable Care Act, the value of insurance expansion for surgical care may depend on the relative balance between increased expenditures and potential health benefits of greater access to elective inpatient procedures.
机译:重要事项《负担得起的医疗法案》的主要重点是增加获得预防和初级护理服务的机会,但是该法律对外科护理的潜在影响尚未明确。目的以马萨诸塞州医疗改革为自然实验条件,评估保险扩展对使用自由裁量和非自由裁量住院手术的不同影响。设计,地点和参与者我们使用了来自马萨诸塞州和两个控制州(新泽西州和纽约州)的州住院病人数据库,以识别自2003年1月1日起接受了酌情或非随意性手术的成年非成年人患者(19-64岁),截止到2010年12月31日。我们将自由选择手术定义为选择性,偏爱敏感程序(例如,关节置换和背部手术),将非自由选择手术定义为必须且可能挽救生命的程序(例如,癌症手术和髋部骨折修复)。暴露研究和对照人群中的所有外科手术。主要结果和措施以2007年7月1日作为改革前和改革后时期之间的过渡点,我们进行了差异分析,以评估整个研究人群中保险扩展对全科医生和非全科医生手术率的影响。以及根据种族,收入和保险状况定义的子组。然后,我们将结果从马萨诸塞州推广到整个美国人口。结果我们在研究期间共确定了836311例外科手术。在马萨诸塞州,保险业务的扩张与酌处手术的使用增加了9.3%(P = .02)。相反,非随意性手术的比率下降了4.5%(P = .009)。我们发现在所有亚组中,随意性手术的效果相似,非白人参与者的增幅最大(19.9%[P <.001])。根据马萨诸塞州的调查结果,我们估计,到2017年全面实施国家保险将产生465 934例额外的全科医生外科手术程序。结论和相关性马萨诸塞州的保险扩展与全科医生的自由手术率增加和同时降低的比率有关。非随意性手术。如果全国范围内根据《平价医疗法案》看到类似的变化,则扩大外科手术医疗保险的价值可能取决于支出增加与更大程度地获得选择性住院程序的潜在健康利益之间的相对平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号