...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal child psychology >Examining the validity of cyclothymic disorder in a youth sample: Replication and extension
【24h】

Examining the validity of cyclothymic disorder in a youth sample: Replication and extension

机译:在青年样本中检验环胸腺疾病的有效性:复制和扩展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

DSM-IV-TR defines four subtypes of bipolar disorder (BP): bipolar I, bipolar II, cyclothymic disorder and bipolar not otherwise specified (NOS). However, cyclothymic disorder in children is rarely researched, or often subsumed in an "NOS" category. The present study tests the replicability of findings from an earlier study, and expands on the criterion validity of cyclothymic disorder in youth. Using the Robins and Guze (1970) framework we examined the validity of cyclothymic disorder as a subtype of BP. Using a youth (ages 5-17) outpatient clinical sample (N = 894), participants with cyclothymic disorder (n = 53) were compared to participants with other BP spectrum disorders (n = 399) and to participants with non-bipolar disorders (n = 442). Analyses tested differences in youth with cyclothymic disorder and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified who do, and those who do not, have a parent with BP. Compared to youth with non-bipolar disorders, youth with cyclothymic disorder had higher irritability (p < 0.001), more comorbidity (p < 0.001), greater sleep disturbance (p < 0.005), and were more likely to have a family history of BP (p < 0.001). Cyclothymic disorder was associated with a younger age of onset compared to depression (p < 0.001) and bipolar II (p = 0.05). Parental BP status was not significantly associated with any variables. Results support that cyclothymic disorder belongs on the bipolar spectrum. Epidemiological studies indicate that cyclothymic disorder is not uncommon and involves significant impairment. Failing to differentiate between cyclothymic disorder and bipolar NOS limits our knowledge about a significant proportion of cases of bipolarity.
机译:DSM-IV-TR定义了躁郁症(BP)的四种亚型:躁郁症I,躁郁症II,环胸腺疾病和未特别指明的躁郁症(NOS)。然而,很少对儿童的环胸腺疾病进行研究,或经常归入“ NOS”类别。本研究测试了较早研究结果的可复制性,并扩展了青年人胸腺疾病的标准有效性。使用Robins and Guze(1970)的框架,我们检查了环胸腺疾病作为BP亚型的有效性。使用青年(5-17岁)门诊临床样本(N = 894),将患有胸腺疾病的参与者(n = 53)与患有其他BP频谱障碍的参与者(n = 399)和患有非双相情感障碍的参与者(n = 399)进行了比较。 n = 442)。分析测试了未另作说明的患有环胸腺疾病和双相情感障碍的年轻人和没有父母的年轻人的差异。与患有非双相情感障碍的年轻人相比,患有环胸腺疾病的年轻人具有更高的易怒性(p <0.001),合并症(p <0.001),更大的睡眠障碍(p <0.005),并且更可能具有BP家族史(p <0.001)。与抑郁症(p <0.001)和双相情感障碍II(p = 0.05)相比,细胞色素异常与发病年龄年轻有关。父母的血压状况与任何变量均无显着相关。结果支持环胸腺疾病属于双极性谱。流行病学研究表明,胸腺疾病并不少见,并涉及重大损害。未能区分睫状胸腺疾病和双相性NOS限制了我们对很大比例的双相性病例的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号