首页> 外文期刊>Japanese journal of radiology >Once-daily radiotherapy to > or =59.4 Gy versus twice-daily radiotherapy to > or =45.0 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a comparative analysis of toxicities and outcomes.
【24h】

Once-daily radiotherapy to > or =59.4 Gy versus twice-daily radiotherapy to > or =45.0 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a comparative analysis of toxicities and outcomes.

机译:限期小细胞肺癌每日一次放射治疗≥59.4Gy与每日两次放射治疗≥45.0Gy并发化疗的有限期小细胞肺癌:毒性和预后的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare toxicities, disease control, survival outcomes, and patterns of failure between groups of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer patients treated with once-daily versus twice-daily radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-institution retrospective analysis included a comparison of two of radiotherapy regimens to planned doses of (1) > or =59.4 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy per once-daily fraction or (2) > or =45 Gy at 1.5 Gy per twice-daily fractions with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. Comparative analyses of toxicities and disease control were performed. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the present study (17 once-daily, 54 twice-daily). Patient, tumor, staging, and treatment factors were similar between the two treatment groups. Median planned radiotherapy doses were 60 Gy (range 59.4-70.0 Gy) and 45 Gy (range 45-51 Gy) for the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively. Acute toxicities were similar between the groups ( approximately 20% grade 3 esophagitis). At a median survival follow-up of 26.2 months (range 3.4-85.5 months), 42 patients had died. The 2-year overall survival estimates were similar at 43% and 49% for the once-daily versus twice-daily groups, respectively. Isolated in-field failures were similar between the two groups ( approximately 17%). CONCLUSION: The present analysis did not detect a statistically significant difference in acute toxicities, disease control, or survival outcomes in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and once-daily versus twice-daily radiotherapy.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较每日一次与每日两次放疗和同步化疗之间的有限期小细胞肺癌患者组之间的毒性,疾病控制,生存结果和失败模式。材料与方法:该单机构回顾性分析包括两种放疗方案与计划剂量的比较:(1)>或= 59.4 Gy,每日一次的剂量为1.8-2.0 Gy,或(2)>或= 45 Gy,每天两次,每次1.5 Gy,同时进行铂类化疗。进行了毒性和疾病控制的比较分析。结果:本研究共纳入71例患者(每天17次,每天54次)。两个治疗组之间的患者,肿瘤,分期和治疗因素相似。每日一次和每天两次的计划放射治疗剂量中位数分别为60 Gy(范围为59.4-70.0 Gy)和45 Gy(范围为45-51 Gy)。两组之间的急性毒性相似(约20%的3级食管炎)。在26.2个月的中位生存期随访(范围3.4-85.5个月)中,有42例患者死亡。每天一次和每天两次的2年总生存率估计值分别相似,分别为43%和49%。两组之间的孤立现场故障相似(大约17%)。结论:本分析未发现在有限期小细胞肺癌患者中,同时进行化学疗法和每日一次与每日两次放射治疗相比,急性毒性,疾病控制或生存结局在统计学上没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号