首页> 外文期刊>Drugs and aging >A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of memantine in patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease.
【24h】

A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of memantine in patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease.

机译:对中度至重度阿尔茨海默氏病患者美金刚的临床和成本效益的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is characterised by a worsening of cognition, functional ability, and behaviour and mood. The objective of this study was to review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of memantine for the treatment of patients with moderately severe to severe AD. To achieve this, a systematic search and review of the clinical and cost effectiveness literature for memantine was undertaken. The literature search covered the period from the inception of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and other electronic databases until July 2004. The search included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and full economic evaluations that assessed the use of memantine in patients with moderately severe to severe AD.Two published RCTs were included in this review; in one of these trials the participants were already being treated with donepezil. The two RCTs showed benefit for patients receiving memantine compared with placebo on the outcome measures of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory modified for severe dementia, the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input, and the Severe Impairment Battery, and that memantine appeared to be slightly more effective in patients already receiving a stable dose of donepezil. Five cost-effectiveness studies were included in the review. Although these studies reported cost reductions and improved outcomes with memantine, the evaluations were based on a number of assumptions.In conclusion, memantine appears to be beneficial when assessed using functional and global measurements. However, the effect of memantine on cognitive scores and behaviour and mood outcomes is less clear. Cost-effectiveness is dependent upon assumptions surrounding clinical effect and context-specific cost data.
机译:阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)是痴呆症的最常见形式,其特征是认知能力,功能能力以及行为和情绪的恶化。这项研究的目的是审查美金刚治疗中重度至重度AD患者的临床和成本效益。为了实现这一目标,对美金刚的临床和成本效益文献进行了系统的搜索和审查。文献检索涵盖了从MEDLINE,Cochrane图书馆,EMBASE和其他电子数据库开始到2004年7月的时期。检索包括随机对照试验(RCT)和全面的经济评估,评估了中重度至重度患者使用美金刚的情况AD。本次审查包括了两个已发布的RCT;在其中一项试验中,参与者已经接受多奈哌齐治疗。与安慰剂相比,这两项RCT在改良严重痴呆症的阿尔茨海默氏病合作研究活动(针对阿尔茨海默氏病的合作研究活动),临床医生基于面试的印象加照料者输入以及严重损伤电池的结局指标方面显示,美金刚患者比安慰剂受益。美金刚对已经接受稳定剂量多奈哌齐的患者似乎更有效。该评价包括五项成本效益研究。尽管这些研究报告了美金刚降低了成本并改善了疗效,但是这些评估是基于许多假设的。总之,使用功能性和整体测量评估美金刚似乎是有益的。然而,美金刚对认知评分,行为和情绪结果的影响尚不清楚。成本效益取决于围绕临床效果的假设以及针对具体情况的成本数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号