首页> 外文期刊>Drugs and aging >Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients: comparison between general medical and geriatric wards.
【24h】

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients: comparison between general medical and geriatric wards.

机译:老年患者中可能不适当用药的流行:普通病房和老年病房之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inappropriate drug use is one of the risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly. We hypothesised that, in elderly patients, geriatricians are more aware of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and may replace or stop PIMs more frequently compared with internists. We therefore evaluated and compared the prevalence of PIMs as well as anticholinergic drug use throughout hospital stay in elderly patients admitted to a medical or geriatric ward. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 800 patients aged > or =65 years admitted to a general medical or geriatric ward of a 700-bed teaching hospital in Switzerland during 2004 were included. PIMs were identified using the Beers criteria published in 2003. The prevalence of anticholinergic drug use was assessed based on drug lists published in the literature. RESULTS: The prevalence of use of PIMs that should generally be avoided was similar in medical and geriatric inpatients both at admission (16.0% vs 20.8%, respectively; p = 0.08) and at discharge (13.3% vs 15.9%, respectively; p = 0.31). In contrast to medical patients, the reduction in the prevalence of use of PIMs between admission and discharge in geriatric patients reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Overall, the three most prevalent inappropriate drugs/drug classes were amiodarone, long-acting benzodiazepines and anticholinergic antispasmodics. At admission, the prevalence of use of PIMs related to a specific diagnosis was not significantly different between patients hospitalised to a medical or a geriatric ward (14.0% vs 17.5%, respectively; p = 0.17), as compared with the significant difference evident at hospital discharge (11.7% vs 23.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). This was largely because of a higher prescription rate of platelet aggregation inhibitors in combination with low-molecular-weight heparins and benzodiazepines in patients with a history of falls and syncope. The proportions of patients taking anticholinergic drugs in medical and geriatric patients at admission (13.0% vs 17.5%, respectively; p = 0.08) and discharge (12.2% vs 16.5%, respectively; p = 0.10) were similar. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate drug use as defined by the Beers criteria was common in both medical and geriatric inpatients. Compared with internists, geriatricians appear to be more aware of PIMs that should generally be avoided, but less aware of PIMs related to a specific diagnosis, and of the need to avoid anticholinergic drug use. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution because some of the drugs identified as potentially inappropriate may in fact be beneficial when the patient's clinical condition is taken into consideration.
机译:背景与目的:滥用毒品是老年人药物不良反应的危险因素之一。我们假设,在老年患者中,老年医生比内科医生更了解潜在的不合适药物(PIM),并且可能更频繁地替换或停止PIM。因此,我们评估了住院或老年病房的老年患者在整个住院期间的PIM患病率以及抗胆碱能药物的使用情况。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了2004年在瑞士700床的教学医院接受普通科或老年病房治疗的800岁以上或= 65岁的患者。根据2003年发布的Beers标准确定了PIM。根据文献中发表的药物清单评估了抗胆碱能药物的使用率。结果:入院时(分别为16.0%和20.8%; p = 0.08)和出院时(分别为13.3%和15.9%),应在医学和老年患者中普遍应避免使用PIM的发生率相似。 0.31)。与医学患者相反,老年患者入院和出院之间使用PIM的患病率降低了统计学意义(p <0.05)。总体而言,三种最普遍的不适当药物/药物类别是胺碘酮,长效苯二氮卓类药物和抗胆碱能解痉药。入院时,在医院或老年病房住院的患者中,与特定诊断相关的PIM的使用率无显着差异(分别为14.0%和17.5%; p = 0.17),而在出院率(分别为11.7%和23.7%; p <0.001)。这主要是由于患有跌倒和晕厥病史的患者血小板凝集抑制剂与低分子肝素和苯二氮卓类药物的处方率较高。入院时(13.0%vs. 17.5%;分别为p = 0.08)和出院时(12.2%vs. 16.5%; p = 0.10),内科和老年患者服用抗胆碱药的患者比例相似。结论:按照比尔斯标准定义的不适当药物使用在医学和老年患者中都很常见。与内科医师相比,老年医师似乎更了解通常应避免的PIM,但对与特定诊断相关的PIM以及对避免使用抗胆碱能药物的了解较少。但是,应谨慎解释本研究的结果,因为考虑到患者的临床状况,某些被确定为潜在不合适的药物可能实际上是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号