...
【24h】

Therapeutic potential of oral antiproliferative agents in the prevention of coronary restenosis.

机译:口服抗增殖药在预防冠状动脉再狭窄方面的治疗潜力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The treatment of coronary artery disease has reached many milestones - from balloon angioplasty to drug-eluting stents. The last decade witnessed the revolution of bare metal stents with new designs, alloys and strut thicknesses. Yet restenosis, the aphorismic 'Achilles heel', remains to be conquered. The restenosis rates with balloon angioplasty alone are 30-40% and are reduced to 20-30% with stents. Although intravascular brachytherapy proved to be a durable and safely used technique to treat in-stent restenosis, clinical event rates were not reduced to single digits.Drug-eluting stents are showing positive results in this direction, but it is too early to predict their efficacy in various subsets of lesions. With the increased usage of these stents, there are reports of problems such as late stent malapposition, subacute and late thromboses, and aneurysm formations due to the vessel toxicity associated with this method of treatment. Furthermore, when multivessel stenting is considered, the cost of drug-eluting stents is a significant problem given the fact that these are no longer 'zero restenosis' devices.There is a definite need for a simple, safe and durable solution to restenosis. Oral agents are an alternative delivery strategy that can target multiple coronary lesions, which are targets for catheter-based revascularisation with any approved metal stent and with potentially lower cost. Although oral agents have been an interesting option to treat restenosis and several agents have been tested in trials since the 1980s, the results were disappointing.The development of devices such as intravascular ultrasound has led to a greater understanding of restenosis mechanisms, and the focus on pathophysiological mechanisms, which centred mainly on platelets, growth factors and lipids, has changed to inflammation, endothelium and smooth muscle cell proliferation.Accordingly, the targets of pharmaceutical agents have shifted from platelets to cell cycle inhibition, smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, synthesis of extra cellular matrix, and inflammatory mediators. Initial encouraging results with oral drugs such as cilostazol, sirolimus (rapamycin) and thiazolidinediones indicate a definite place for this strategy to reduce restenosis. A desirable oral agent would be anti-inflammatory, inhibit smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation, promote endothelial growth, and be well tolerated and free from significant adverse effects. It may be useful to start with a high loading dose before stent implantation and then follow with a short-term lower maintenance dose. Future trials should be aimed at finding an ideal agent, effective loading dose, maintenance dose and optimum duration of therapy.
机译:冠状动脉疾病的治疗已达到许多里程碑-从球囊血管成形术到药物洗脱支架。过去十年见证了裸金属支架的革命,这些支架采用了新的设计,合金和支杆厚度。再狭窄,格言的“致命弱点”,仍有待克服。仅使用球囊血管成形术的再狭窄率是30-40%,而使用支架可降低到20-30%。尽管血管内近距离放疗已被证明是治疗支架内再狭窄的一种持久且安全的技术,但临床事件发生率并未降低到一位数。药物洗脱支架在该方向上已显示出积极的成果,但预测其疗效为时过早在病变的各个子集中。随着这些支架的使用的增加,由于与该治疗方法相关的血管毒性,出现了诸如晚期支架贴壁不良,亚急性和晚期血栓形成以及动脉瘤形成等问题的报道。此外,考虑到多支血管支架置入术,考虑到这些不再是``零再狭窄''装置,药物洗脱支架的成本是一个重大问题,因此迫切需要一种简单,安全且持久的再狭窄解决方案。口服药物是一种可以靶向多个冠状动脉病变的替代性递送策略,这是使用任何已获批准的金属支架进行基于导管的血运重建的目标,而且成本可能更低。尽管口服药物一直是治疗再狭窄的有趣方法,并且自1980年代以来已经在试验中测试了多种药物,但结果令人失望。病理生理机制主要集中在血小板,生长因子和脂质上,已转变为炎症,内皮和平滑肌细胞增殖,因此,药物的靶点已从血小板转向抑制细胞周期,平滑肌细胞增殖和迁移,合成多余的细胞基质和炎症介质。口服药物如西洛他唑,西罗莫司(雷帕霉素)和噻唑烷二酮类药物最初的令人鼓舞的结果表明该策略可减少再狭窄。理想的口服剂应是消炎的,抑制平滑肌细胞迁移和增殖,促进内皮生长,并且被很好地耐受并且没有明显的副作用。从支架植入之前的高负荷剂量开始,然后以短期较低的维持剂量开始可能是有用的。未来的试验应旨在寻找理想的药物,有效的剂量,维持剂量和最佳治疗时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号