【24h】

Newer biological agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: do the benefits outweigh the risks?

机译:治疗类风湿关节炎的新型生物制剂:益处大于风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, three new biological agents, rituximab, abatacept and tocilizumab, have become available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with active disease, who have not responded to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, abatacept modulates T-cell activation and tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist. Clinical studies with these agents have demonstrated that they are effective in RA patients with moderate to active disease, who have not responded to treatment with at least one DMARD and/or tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Thus far, there is no convincing evidence to show that one of these three new drugs has a superior efficacy over the others or that they have other benefits compared with the TNF inhibitors. The use of rituximab, instead of another TNF inhibitor, might be an option in patients who have not responded to TNF blockade. Abatacept could also be considered, but this has not yet been formally tested. A practical advantage of tocilizumab is that it may be administered as a first-line biological agent. Adverse events, including (usually mild) infusion reactions, are common. There is a small increased risk of serious infections that appears to be similar to that with TNF inhibitors, although each drug may have its own particular risk profile. Thus far, there is no convincing evidence that the new biological agents are associated with an increased risk of malignancies. However, the number of patient-years studied is still rather limited and, hence, continuous postmarketing surveillance is necessary. Adequate studies directly comparing new biological agents with each other and with other biological agents, such as TNF inhibitors, are not available. Hence, no firm conclusions regarding the benefit-risk profile of these agents versus each other can be reached. However, the benefit for a given new biological agent currently appears to outweigh the risk for an individual RA patient with active disease, despite earlier drug treatment.
机译:最近,三种新的生物制剂,利妥昔单抗,阿巴西普和托珠单抗,已用于治疗活动性疾病的风湿性关节炎(RA),这些患者对至少一种疾病缓解性抗风湿药(DMARD)没有反应。利妥昔单抗是一种抗CD20单克隆抗体,阿巴西普可以调节T细胞活化,托珠单抗是一种白介素6受体拮抗剂。这些药物的临床研究表明,它们对中度至活动性疾病的RA患者有效,这些患者对至少一种DMARD和/或肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的治疗无反应。迄今为止,没有令人信服的证据表明这三种新药中的一种具有优于其他药物的功效,或者与TNF抑制剂相比它们具有其他益处。对于未对TNF阻断有反应的患者,可以使用利妥昔单抗代替另一种TNF抑制剂。也可以考虑使用Abatacept,但这尚未经过正式测试。托珠单抗的实际优势是可以作为一线生物制剂给药。不良事件很常见,包括(通常是轻微的)输注反应。严重感染的风险有所增加,这似乎与使用TNF抑制剂的风险相似,尽管每种药物可能都有其自己的特殊风险状况。迄今为止,没有令人信服的证据表明新的生物制剂与恶性肿瘤风险增加有关。但是,研究的患者年数仍然相当有限,因此,需要进行持续的上市后监督。没有足够的研究直接将新的生物制剂相互之间以及与其他生物制剂(例如TNF抑制剂)进行比较。因此,无法得出关于这些代理相对于彼此的利益风险概况的确切结论。但是,尽管有较早的药物治疗,但是给定的新生物制剂的益处目前似乎超过了患有活动性疾病的RA患者的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号