首页> 外文期刊>DNA repair >Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil
【24h】

Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil

机译:尿嘧啶-DNA糖基化酶UNG2和SMUG1的显着不同特性可能解释了基因组尿嘧啶加工中的不同作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Genomic uracil resulting from spontaneously deaminated cytosine generates mutagenic U:G mismatches that are usually corrected by error-free base excision repair (BER). However, in B-cells, activation-induced cytosine deaminase (AID) generates U:G mismatches in hot-spot sequences at Ig loci. These are subject to mutagenic processing during somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). Uracil N-glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 (single strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1) initiate error-free BER in most DNA contexts, but UNG2 is also involved in mutagenic processing of AID-induced uracil during the antibody diversification process, the regulation of which is not understood. AID is strictly single strand-specific. Here we show that in the presence of Mg 2+ and monovalent salts, human and mouse SMUG1 are essentially double strand-specific, whereas UNG2 efficiently removes uracil from both single and double stranded DNA under all tested conditions. Furthermore, SMUG1 and UNG2 display widely different sequence preferences. Interestingly, uracil in a hot-spot sequence for AID is 200-fold more efficiently removed from single stranded DNA by UNG2 than by SMUG1. This may explain why SMUG1, which is not excluded from Ig loci, is unable to replace UNG2 in antibody diversification. We suggest a model for mutagenic processing in which replication protein A (RPA) recruits UNG2 to sites of deamination and keeps DNA in a single stranded conformation, thus avoiding error-free BER of the deaminated cytosine.
机译:自发脱氨基胞嘧啶产生的基因组尿嘧啶产生诱变的U:G错配,通常可通过无错碱基切除修复(BER)进行纠正。但是,在B细胞中,激活诱导的胞嘧啶脱氨酶(AID)在Ig位点的热点序列中产生U:G错配。这些在体细胞超突变(SHM)和类别开关重组(CSR)期间受到诱变处理。尿嘧啶N-糖基化酶UNG2和SMUG1(单链选择性单功能尿嘧啶-DNA糖基化酶1)在大多数DNA环境中均可启动无错BER,但是UNG2在抗体多样化过程中也参与了AID诱导的尿嘧啶的诱变加工,调控其中不被理解。 AID严格是单链特定的。在这里,我们显示在存在Mg 2+和一价盐的情况下,人和小鼠SMUG1本质上是双链特异性的,而UNG2在所有测试条件下均能有效地从单链和双链DNA中去除尿嘧啶。此外,SMUG1和UNG2显示了大不相同的序列首选项。有趣的是,UNG2从单链DNA中去除AID热点序列中的尿嘧啶的效率比SMUG1高200倍。这可以解释为什么未从Ig基因位点排除的SMUG1在抗体多样化中不能替代UNG2。我们提出了一种诱变处理模型,其中复制蛋白A(RPA)将UNG2募集到脱氨位点,并将DNA保持在单链构象中,从而避免了脱氨基胞嘧啶的无误BER。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号