...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Staging of early colorectal cancers: magnifying colonoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography for estimation of depth of invasion.
【24h】

Staging of early colorectal cancers: magnifying colonoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography for estimation of depth of invasion.

机译:早期大肠癌的分期:结肠镜检查与内镜超声检查相结合,以评估浸润深度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preoperative estimation of depth of invasion in early colorectal cancers (CRCs) is essential for patient management. This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracies of magnifying colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for estimating the depth of invasion of early CRCs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 438 early CRCs were removed endoscopically or surgically from July 1993 through March 1999 at our hospital. Before removal, 102 lesions were evaluated with both magnifying colonoscopy and EUS and were included in this analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of each method, referring to the histology of the resected specimens, was evaluated. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracies were 87% (89/102) for magnifying colonoscopy and 75% (76/102) for EUS (P = 0.0985). Subgroup analysis was also done for polypoid and non-polypoid lesions. For polypoid lesions, the overall diagnostic accuracies of magnifying colonoscopy and EUS were 88% (60/68) and 72% (49/68), (P = 0.0785), and for non-polypoid lesions, they were 85% (29/34) and 79% (27/34), (P = 0.7169). CONCLUSION: Although, there is a substantial difference in the overall diagnostic accuracies, it is not statistically significant. Therefore, we conclude that magnifying colonoscopy is at least as accurate as EUS for preoperative staging of early CRCs.
机译:背景与目的:术前评估早期结直肠癌(CRC)的浸润深度对于患者管理至关重要。这项研究的目的是比较放大结肠镜检查和内镜超声检查(EUS)的诊断准确性,以估计早期CRC的浸润深度。研究对象和方法:从1993年7月至1999年3月,在我们的医院内镜或手术切除了438例早期CRC。切除前,通过放大结肠镜检查和EUS评估了102个病变,并包括在该分析中。参照切除标本的组织学评估每种方法的诊断准确性。结果:放大结肠镜检查的总体诊断准确性为87%(89/102),EUS的总体诊断准确性为75%(76/102)(P = 0.0985)。还对息肉样和非息肉样病变进行了亚组分析。对于息肉样病变,放大结肠镜和EUS的总体诊断准确性为88%(60/68)和72%(49/68),(P = 0.0785),而对于非息肉样病变,它们的诊断准确性为85%(29 / 34)和79%(27/34),(P = 0.7169)。结论:尽管总体诊断准确度存在实质性差异,但在统计学上并不显着。因此,我们得出结论,对于早期CRC的术前分期,放大结肠镜检查至少与EUS一样准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号