首页> 外文期刊>Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice >Navigating the profits and pitfalls of governmental partnerships: the ICRC and intergovernmental relief, 1918-23
【24h】

Navigating the profits and pitfalls of governmental partnerships: the ICRC and intergovernmental relief, 1918-23

机译:驾驭政府合作伙伴关系的利益和陷阱:红十字国际委员会与政府间救济,1918-23年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is today a staunch proponent of the need for humanitarian organisations to remain independent of state interests, yet it deliberately solicited intergovernmental intervention in international relief after the First World War of 1914-18. This paper examines why an organisation committed to upholding the independence and impartiality of humanitarian action might still choose to partner with governmental bodies. It also highlights the historical beginnings of a linkage between international aid and geopolitics. To secure governmental funding for refugee relief during the 1920s, the ICRC argued that the humanitarian crises of the post-war years were a threat to the political and social stability of Europe. While this has become axiomatic, the interwar history of the ICRC demonstrates that the perceived connection between relief and geopolitical stability is historically constructed, and that it must continue to be asserted persuasively to be effective.
机译:今天,红十字国际委员会坚定地支持人道组织保持独立于国家利益的需要,但它还是故意要求政府间干预1914-18年第一次世界大战后的国际救援。本文探讨了为什么一个致力于维护人道主义行动的独立性和公正性的组织仍可能选择与政府机构合作。它还强调了国际援助与地缘政治之间联系的历史起点。为确保政府在1920年代为难民救济提供资金,红十字国际委员会认为,战后几年的人道危机对欧洲的政治和社会稳定构成了威胁。尽管这已成为公理,但红十字国际委员会在两次战争之间的历史表明,救济与地缘政治稳定之间的可感知联系是历史悠久的,必须继续有说服力地断言这种联系是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号