...
首页> 外文期刊>Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice >Predicting support for non-pharmaceutical interventions during infectious outbreaks: a four region analysis
【24h】

Predicting support for non-pharmaceutical interventions during infectious outbreaks: a four region analysis

机译:预测传染性暴发期间对非药物干预措施的支持:四区域分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are an important public health tool for responding to infectious disease outbreaks, including pandemics. However, little is known about the individual characteristics associated with support for NPIs, or whether they are consistent across regions. This study draws on survey data from four regionsHong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United Statescollected following the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak of 2002-03, and employs regression techniques to estimate predictors of NPI support. It finds that characteristics associated with NPI support vary widely by region, possibly because of cultural variation and prior experience, and that minority groups tend to be less supportive of NPIs when arrest is the consequence of noncompliance. Prior experience of face-mask usage also results in increased support for future usage, as well as other NPIs. Policymakers should be attentive to local preferences and to the application of compulsory interventions. It is speculated here that some public health interventions may serve as gateway' exposures to future public health interventions.
机译:非药物干预措施(NPI)是应对包括大流行在内的传染病暴发的重要公共卫生工具。但是,对于与支持NPI相关的各个特征,或者它们在各个地区之间是否一致,知之甚少。这项研究基于2002-03年严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)爆发后收集的来自香港,新加坡,台湾和美国四个地区的调查数据,并使用回归技术来估算NPI支持的预测因子。研究发现,与NPI支持相关的特征因地区而异,这可能是由于文化差异和先前的经验所致;当逮捕是不遵守规定的结果时,少数群体倾向于不支持NPI。以前使用口罩的经验还导致增加了对将来使用以及其他NPI的支持。政策制定者应注意当地的偏好和强制性干预措施的应用。据推测,某些公共卫生干预措施可能会成为未来公共卫生干预措施的门户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号