首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the Colon and Rectum >A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
【24h】

A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

机译:在有或没有新辅助放化疗的直肠癌患者中,1 mm的环周切缘是阴性的预后因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There is ongoing debate about the appropriate criterion for defining a positive circumferential resection margin after radical surgery for rectal cancer. Objective: The purpose of this work was to determine the importance of the extent of the circumferential resection margin with regard to outcomes in patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Patients: We reviewed the medical charts of 780 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery from 2004 to 2009. There were 599 patients (76.8%) who did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 181 patients (23.2%) who did. Main Outcome Measures: The relationship between the extent of the circumferential resection margin (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mm) and recurrence and survival was assessed. Results: Among circumferential resection margins ≤0.5, ≤1.0, ≤2.0, and ≤3.0 mm, the HR was highest and diseasefree survival was longest for a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm in both the chemoradiotherapy and nonchemoradiotherapy groups. A circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm, lymphatic invasion, histology, pathologic T category, pathologic N category, preoperative CEA, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of disease-free survival in the nonchemoradiotherapy group. In the chemoradiotherapy group, a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm and histology were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that a circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both of the 2 groups. Limitations: This was a single-institution, retrospective study. Conclusions: A circumferential resection margin of ≤1 mm had a strong association with disease-free survival compared with circumferential resection margins ≤0.5, ≤2.0, and ≤3 mm. A circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was an independent predictor of a poor outcome in both the nonchemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups.
机译:背景:关于直肠癌根治性手术后确定积极的圆周切除切缘的适当标准存在争议。目的:这项工作的目的是确定在接受全直肠系膜切除并伴有新辅助放化疗的直肠癌患者中,周缘切除余量对预后的重要性。设计:这是对预期收集的数据的回顾性回顾。地点:该研究是在三级医院进行的。病人:我们回顾了2004年至2009年接受手术的780例直肠癌患者的病历。有599例(76.8%)未接受新辅助放化疗,有181例(23.2%)未接受新辅助放化疗。主要观察指标:评估周缘切缘范围(0.5、1.0、2.0和3.0 mm)与复发和生存之间的关系。结果:在放化疗组和非放化疗组中,在≤0.5,≤1.0,≤2.0和≤3.0mm的环行切缘中,HR最高,无病生存时间最长,≤1mm。在非放化疗组中,周缘切缘≤1mm,淋巴管浸润,组织学,病理学T类,病理学N类,术前CEA和辅助化疗是无病生存的独立预测指标。在放化疗组中,圆周切除边缘≤1mm和组织学是无病生存的独立预测因子。多因素分析表明,两组的总生存率均独立于预后因素,而环切缘≤1 mm。局限性:这是单机构的回顾性研究。结论:环切缘≤1mm与无病生存率密切相关,而环切缘≤0.5,≤2.0和≤3mm。在非放化疗组和放化疗组中,周缘切缘≤1 mm是不良预后的独立预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号