首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the Colon and Rectum >High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses.
【24h】

High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses.

机译:大肠癌肠系膜下动脉高结扎扎带与低结扎血管结扎:对结肠长度增加的影响以及对吻合术的可行性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is no demonstrated benefit of high-tie versus low-tie vascular transections in colorectal cancer surgery.The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high-tie and low-tie vascular transections on colonic length after oncological sigmoidectomy, the theoretical feasibility of colorectal anastomosis at the sacral promontory, and straight or J-pouch coloanal anastomosis after rectal cancer surgery with total mesorectal excision.This study is an anatomical study on surgical techniques.This study was conducted in a surgical anatomy research unit.Thirty fresh nonembalmed cadavers were randomly assigned to high-tie and low-tie groups (n = 15).Oncological sigmoidectomy followed by total mesorectal excision was performed.The distances from the proximal colon limb to the lower edge of the pubis symphysis were recorded after each step of vascular division.The successive mean gains in length in high-tie vs low-tie vascular transections were 2.9±1.2 cm vs 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (p = 0.83) after inferior mesenteric artery division, 8.1 ± 3.1 cm vs 2.5 ± 1.2 cm (p = 0.0016) after inferior mesenteric vein division at the lower part of the pancreas, 8.1 ± 3.8 cm vs 3.3 ± 1.7 cm (p = 0.0016) after sigmoidectomy. The mean cumulative gain in length was significantly higher in high-tie vs low-tie vascular transections (19.1 ± 3.8 vs 8.8 ± 2.9 cm, p = 0.00089). After secondary left colic artery division, the gain in length was similar to that of the high-tie group (17 ± 3.1 vs 19.1 ± 3.8 cm) (p = 0.089). Colorectal anastomosis at the promontory and straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomosis feasibility rates were 100% in the high-tie group, 87%, 53%, and 33% in the low-tie group, but 100%, 100%, and 87% after secondary left colic artery division.This anatomical study, based on cadavers rather than live patients, does not evaluate colon limb vascularization.The gain in colonic length is 10 cm greater for high-tie vascular transections. With low-tie vascular transections, high inferior mesenteric vein division produced a small additional gain in length, and secondary left colic artery division produced the same length gain as high-tie vascular transections.
机译:大结扎血管和低结扎血管在大肠癌手术中没有显示出任何益处。本研究的目的是比较在肿瘤乙状结肠切除术后高结扎血管和低结扎血管对结肠长度的影响,理论上是可行的。直肠癌手术后全直肠系膜切除术治疗the部结肠直肠吻合术和直肠直行或J袋结肠吻合术。本研究是一项手术技术的解剖学研究。本研究是在外科解剖学研究单位中进行的.30例新鲜的无脊椎动物尸体随机分为高领带组和低领带组(n = 15)。先行肿瘤乙状结肠切除术,然后行全直肠系膜切除术。记录每一步血管后从结肠近端到耻骨联合下缘的距离结扎后,高领带和低领带血管横断的连续平均长度增长分别为2.9±1.2 cm和3.1±1.8 cm(p = 0.83)肠下部肠系膜下静脉分离后,胰腺下部下部肠系膜下静脉分离后为8.1±3.1 cm vs. 2.5±1.2 cm(p = 0.0016),乙状结肠切除术后为8.1±3.8 cm vs. 3.3±1.7 cm(p = 0.0016)。高领带血管横断和低领带血管横断的平均长度累积增高显着(19.1±3.8 vs 8.8±2.9 cm,p = 0.00089)。继发的左结肠动脉二次分割后,长度的增加与高扎组的长度增加相似(17±3.1 vs 19.1±3.8 cm)(p = 0.089)。高领带组在海角和直行和J型袋结肠吻合术中的结直肠吻合率分别为100%,低领带组分别为87%,53%和33%,但分别为100%,100%和87继发左结肠动脉分割后的%。这项解剖学研究基于尸体而不是活着的患者,未评估结肠肢体血管化。高扎血管切开术的结肠长度增加10 cm。对于低束缚血管横切术,高位肠系膜下静脉分裂产生的长度增加很小,而次次结肠绞痛的左结肠动脉分裂产生的长度与高束缚血管横切术相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号