首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: A systematic review
【24h】

Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: A systematic review

机译:根据功能,残疾和健康的国际分类,对腰痛使用的问卷和量表进行内容比较:系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To identify questionnaires and scales that measure functioning and disability in low-back pain (LBP) and determine whether the measurements are comparable with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICFDH). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBase, CINAHL and PEDro in English, and CNKI and Wanfang Data in Chinese in a period from the date of the database establishment to September 2010. From the identified literature, questionnaires and scales used to assess LBP-related functioning and disability were collected and classified. Each item in each questionnaire and scale was extracted and classified according to the ICFDH categories. Results: We have reviewed 7968 published articles and identified a total of fifteen questionnaires. A total of 219 items were analyzed and a total of 354 concepts contained in these items and 345 could be linked to ICFDH components, 138 linked to body function, 20 to body structure, 174 to activities and participation, and 13 to environmental factors, and 9 to a non-classifiable cluster. In the body functions component, only the single category "sensation of pain" was covered by most questionnaires. In the activity and participation component, "changing basic body position"; "walking" and "maintaining a body position" were covered by most questionnaires. Analyzing individual questionnaires, we found that two questionnaires (Clinical Back Pain Questionnaire and Million Disability Questionnaire) demonstrate a well-balanced distribution of items across different ICFDH components. Conclusion: This study may help researchers and clinicians to choose the most appropriate questionnaires for a specific purpose as well as help compare studies that have used different questionnaires for low back pain assessment and provide valuable information on the content quality of these questionnaires for them. Furthermore, based on our results, more comprehensive and balanced instruments may be developed for more accurate assessment of functioning in LBP and perhaps other clinical conditions. Implications for Rehabiliation Low back pain (LBP) is the most common cause of referral to a physical therapist and is one of the most important causes of disability. The ICFDH is based on the bio-psycho-social model of functioning, disability and health and offers a detailed and etiologically neutral classification. Content comparison may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate questionnaires.
机译:目的:确定用于测量下腰痛(LBP)的功能和残疾的问卷和量表,并确定这些测量值是否与国际功能,残疾和健康分类(ICFDH)相当。方法:从数据库建立之日至2010年9月,我们以英文搜索MEDLINE,EMBase,CINAHL和PEDro,以中文搜索CNKI和Wanfang数据。从确定的文献,问卷和量表中评估LBP相关功能对残疾和残疾进行分类。每个问卷和量表中的每个项目均根据ICFDH类别进行提取和分类。结果:我们审查了7968篇已发表的文章,共确定了15份问卷。共分析了219个项目,其中包含354个概念,其中345个与ICFDH组件相关,138个与身体功能相关,20个与身体结构相关,174个与活动和参与相关,13个与环境因素相关, 9归类为不可分类的集群。在身体机能部分中,大多数问卷仅涵盖单一类别的“疼痛感”。在活动和参与部分中,“更改基本身体位置”;大多数问卷都涉及“走路”和“保持身体姿势”。通过分析单个调查表,我们发现两个调查表(临床腰痛调查表和百万残疾调查表)证明了ICFDH不同组件之间项目的均衡分配。结论:本研究可以帮助研究人员和临床医生针对特定目的选择最合适的问卷,并有助于比较使用不同问卷进行腰痛评估的研究,并为他们提供有关这些问卷内容质量的有价值的信息。此外,根据我们的结果,可能会开发出更全面,更平衡的工具,以更准确地评估LBP以及其他临床状况的功能。康复的含义下腰痛(LBP)是转诊给理疗师的最常见原因,也是导致残疾的最重要原因之一。 ICFDH基于功能,残疾和健康的生物-心理-社会模型,并提供了详细的,病因学上中立的分类。内容比较可以帮助临床医生选择最合适的问卷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号