...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >MALDI-TOF is not useful in the diagnosis of catheter colonization based on superficial cultures: results from an in vitro study
【24h】

MALDI-TOF is not useful in the diagnosis of catheter colonization based on superficial cultures: results from an in vitro study

机译:MALDI-TOF不适用于基于浅层培养的导管定植诊断:一项体外研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compared in an vitro model the yields of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) and conventional culture (CC) for the detection of catheter colonization with superficial catheter samples (SS). We used blood culture bottles (BCB) with an inserted cannula and incubated at 37 degrees C. The BCB were manipulated with different contaminations and when a BCB turned positive, SS were obtained to perform both techniques. To compare both techniques we analyzed the mean time to colonization (MTC) and the mean time to a result (MTR). The MTC (SD, days) by CC and MALDI-TOF was as follows: hub, 0.59 (0.79) versus 1.07 (139), P = 0.06; surface: 0.62 (0.67) versus 0.82 (0.81), P < 0.001. The MTR (SD, days) of CC and MALDI-TOF was as follows: hub: 1.58 (0.79) versus 225 (1.48), P = 0.04; surface: 1.62 (0.67) versus 1.95 (0.80), P < 0.001. In general, the use of MALDI-TOF performed directly with SS was no better than CC and did not anticipate colonization results. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我们在体外模型中比较了基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)和常规培养物(CC)的产率,以检测浅表导管样品(SS)的导管定植。我们使用带有插入套管的血液培养瓶(BCB),并在37°C下孵育。对BCB进行了不同的污染处理,当BCB变为阳性时,将获得SS来执行这两种技术。为了比较这两种技术,我们分析了平均定殖时间(MTC)和平均定殖时间(MTR)。 CC和MALDI-TOF得出的MTC(标准差,天)如下:中枢,分别为0.59(0.79)和1.07(139),P = 0.06;表面:0.62(0.67)对0.82(0.81),P <0.001。 CC和MALDI-TOF的MTR(标准差,天)如下:中枢:1.58(0.79)对225(1.48),P = 0.04;表面:1.62(0.67)对1.95(0.80),P <0.001。通常,直接与SS一起使用MALDI-TOF并不比CC更好,并且无法预期到定植结果。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号