...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >A comparison of agar dilution with the Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity (CDS) and Etest methods for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone against Neisseria gonorrhoeae
【24h】

A comparison of agar dilution with the Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity (CDS) and Etest methods for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone against Neisseria gonorrhoeae

机译:琼脂稀释液与校准二分法灵敏度(CDS)和Etest方法的比较,用于确定头孢曲松对淋病奈瑟菌的最小抑制浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity (CDS) based agar dilution (CDS AD) method with the Etest (bioMerieux SA) methods using 2 method protocols for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The two method protocols were the manufacturer's protocol for which the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretative criteria for Neisseria gonorrhoeae could be applied, and the CDS-adapted protocol. Comparability of MIC data is critical for situation analysis and monitoring trends in global antimicrobial analysis.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较使用两种方法确定头孢曲松对奈瑟氏菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的基于校准二分法(CDS)的琼脂稀释(CDS AD)方法与Etest(bioMerieux SA)方法的比较淋病科。这两种方法规程是制造商规程,适用于淋病奈瑟菌的临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)解释性标准,以及适用于CDS的规程。 MIC数据的可比性对于形势分析和全球抗菌分析趋势的监测至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号