...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >Scoring system for differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial cells on cytology specimens.
【24h】

Scoring system for differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial cells on cytology specimens.

机译:在细胞学标本上鉴别诊断恶性间皮瘤和反应性间皮细胞的评分系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cytology is the only useful tool in the detection of malignant mesothelioma (MM) at an early stage. No other methods, such as immunocytochemistry or electron microscopy, are available to distinguish MM from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC). Some objective analysis of cytology specimens is necessary. On the basis of our case review and cytological features described in previous articles, we developed a scoring system for malignant mesothelioma (SSMM) of effusion cytology to distinguish MM cells from RMC. Mesothelioma cells in effusions from 22 patients (20 pleural and 2 peritoneal mesotheliomas) were compared with RMC from 20 patients without obvious tumor cells and 50 effusions containing metastatic carcinoma cells. The SSMM is based on characteristic features of mesothelial and malignant cells. The total achievable score is 10 points: one point each is given for variety of cell size, cyanophilic cytoplasm with villosity/windows/bleb, sheet-like arrangement, mirror-ball-like cell clusters, nuclear atypia, and cannibalism, respectively. Further two points each are ascribed for acidophilic large nucleoli and multinucleated cells with more than eight nuclei. The total score for each of the 22 mesotheliomas was more than 5 points. On the other hand, all RMC and the 50 metastatic carcinoma cases scored less than 3 points, aside from two cases that were treated with OK432. No single characteristic feature was observed to be consistent within the 22 mesotheliomas analyzed. Ancillary use of immunocytochemistry, such as podoplanin (D2-40) and calretinin, supported the diagnostic accuracy of the SSMM. SSMM is useful for the differential diagnosis of MM.
机译:细胞学是早期检测恶性间皮瘤(MM)的唯一有用工具。没有其他方法,如免疫细胞化学或电子显微镜,可将MM与反应性间皮细胞(RMC)区分开。细胞学标本的一些客观分析是必要的。基于我们在先前文章中描述的病例回顾和细胞学特征,我们开发了一种针对积液细胞学的恶性间皮瘤(SSMM)评分系统,以区分MM细胞与RMC。将22例患者的胸膜间皮瘤细胞(20例胸膜间皮瘤和2例腹膜间皮瘤)与20例无明显肿瘤细胞和50例含有转移性癌细胞的胸膜间皮瘤细胞进行了比较。 SSMM基于间皮细胞和恶性细胞的特征。可达到的总分是10分:分别针对各种细胞大小,具有绒毛/窗口/气泡的嗜蓝细胞质,片状排列,镜球状细胞簇,核异型性和食人性分别获得1分。另外两个点分别归因于嗜酸大核仁和具有八个以上核的多核细胞。 22种间皮瘤中每一种的总分均超过5分。另一方面,除了两例用OK432治疗的病例外,所有RMC和50例转移癌病例的得分均低于3分。在所分析的22种间皮瘤中,未观察到任何单一特征是一致的。免疫细胞化学的辅助使用,例如Podoplanin(D2-40)和Calretinin,可支持SSMM的诊断准确性。 SSMM对于MM的鉴别诊断很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号