首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes research and clinical practice >Comparative electrophysiological techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.
【24h】

Comparative electrophysiological techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.

机译:比较电生理技术诊断糖尿病多发性神经病患者腕管综合征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine utility of comparative electrophysiological techniques in differentiating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the background of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). DESIGN: Ninety diabetic patients were classified into three groups: normal, CTS, and DPN according to nerve conduction studies (NCSs). The patients in the DPN group were divided into two subgroups of DPN and DPN-CTS according to clinical criteria. The comparative electrophysiological parameters including median-radial sensory distal latency difference (M-RSLD), median-ulnar sensory distal latency difference (M-USLD) and lumbrical-interosseous median-ulnar distal latency difference (LIMULD) were compared in subgroups of DPN, DPN-CTS and CTS. RESULTS: Thirty-five (38.8%), 47 (52.3%), and 8 (8.9%) patients were diagnosed as CTS, DPN, and normal, respectively, according to NCS. After clinical stratification, 25 patients were diagnosed as DPN and 22 patients were diagnosed as DPN-CTS. The mean M-USLD and LIMULD values were similar in CTS and DPN-CTS groups, but larger than DPN statistically (p<0.05 for all). LIMULD, M-RSLD and M-USLD were positive in 88.4, 73 and 54% in the DPN-CTS group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological abnormalities were common in diabetic patients and LIMULD can identify CTS in diabetic DPN patients better than M-RSLD and M-USLD.
机译:目的:确定比较电生理技术在糖尿病多发性神经病(DPN)背景下鉴别腕管综合症(CTS)的实用性。设计:根据神经传导研究(NCS),将90名糖尿病患者分为三类:正常,CTS和DPN。根据临床标准,将DPN组的患者分为DPN和DPN-CTS两个亚组。在DPN的亚组中比较了比较的电生理参数,包括中位-骨感觉远端潜伏期差异(M-RSLD),中尺骨感觉远端潜伏期差异(M-USLD)和管间骨中位尺骨远端潜伏期差异(LIMULD) DPN-CTS和CTS。结果:根据NCS,分别有35例(38.8%),47例(52.3%)和8例(8.9%)被诊断为CTS,DPN和正常。临床分层后,诊断为DPN 25例,诊断DPN-CTS 22例。在CTS组和DPN-CTS组中,M-USLD和LIMULD的平均值相似,但在统计学上大于DPN(所有P <0.05)。 DPN-CTS组的LIMULD,M-RSLD和M-USLD阳性分别为88.4、73和54%。结论:电生理异常在糖尿病患者中很普遍,LIMULD可以比D-RSLD和M-USLD更好地识别DPN糖尿病患者的CTS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号