...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Postprandial vascular effects of VIAject compared with insulin lispro and regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
【24h】

Postprandial vascular effects of VIAject compared with insulin lispro and regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

机译:与2代糖尿病患者的赖脯胰岛素和普通人胰岛素相比,VIAject的餐后血管作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggested an impact of prandial insulin delivery on postprandial regulation of tissue blood flow. This study compared the effect of VIAject with human regular insulin and insulin lispro on postprandial oxidative stress and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (seven men; aged 61.5 +/- 1.8 years; duration of diabetes 6.6 +/- 4.6 years; A1C 7.2 +/- 0.5% [mean +/- SEM]) received a prandial injection of VIAject, human regular insulin, and insulin lispro. At baseline and after a standardized liquid meal test (Ensure Plus), the postprandial increases in asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and nitrotyrosine levels were investigated. In addition, the postprandial effects on microvascular blood flow, skin oxygenation, and vascular elasticity were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with VIAject resulted in a significant reduction in the peak postprandial generation of ADMA compared with human insulin and insulin lispro (VIAject -27.3 +/- 22.6, human insulin 97.7 +/- 24.4, and insulin lispro 66.9 +/- 33.9 nmol/l; P < 0.05, respectively). The postprandial increases in nitrotyrosine levels were significantly less after VIAject than after human regular insulin (VIAject -0.22 +/- 0.17 vs. human insulin 0.25 +/- 0.15 microg/ml; P < 0.05), whereas nitrotyrosine after insulin lispro was in between (insulin lispro 0.09 +/- 0.07 microg/ml; NS). In parallel, earlier and more pronounced increases in microvascular blood flow and skin oxygenation were obtained after VIAject compared with those after human insulin or insulin lispro (P < 0.05, respectively). All insulin formulations resulted in comparable improvements in central arterial elasticity. CONCLUSIONS; Treatment with VIAject reduced postprandial oxidative stress and improved endothelial function compared with human regular insulin or insulin lispro.
机译:目的:最近的研究表明餐后胰岛素的输送对餐后组织血流量的调节有影响。这项研究比较了VIAject与人常规胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者餐后氧化应激和内皮功能的影响。研究设计与方法:14位患者(经静脉注射)经静脉注射VIAject(七名男性;年龄61.5 +/- 1.8岁;糖尿病病程6.6 +/- 4.6年; A1C 7.2 +/- 0.5%[平均值+/- SEM])。 ,人类普通胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素。在基线和标准化的液体餐测试(Ensure Plus)之后,研究了餐后不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)和硝基酪氨酸水平的增加。此外,测量了餐后对微血管血流量,皮肤氧合和血管弹性的影响。结果:与人胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素相比,用VIAject治疗可显着降低餐后ADMA的峰值生成(VIAject -27.3 +/- 22.6,人胰岛素97.7 +/- 24.4和lispro 66.9 +/- 33.9 nmol / l; P分别为<0.05)。餐后硝酸酪氨酸水平的升高显着低于人普通胰岛素后(VIAject -0.22 +/- 0.17 vs.人胰岛素0.25 +/- 0.15 microg / ml; P <0.05),而赖脯胰岛素在硝酸酪氨酸水平介于(赖脯胰岛素0.09 +/- 0.07 microg / ml; NS)。同时,与人胰岛素或赖脯胰岛素相比,VIAject后微血管血流量和皮肤氧合增加更早,更明显(分别为P <0.05)。所有胰岛素制剂均导致中央动脉弹性的可比改善。结论;与人常规胰岛素或赖脯胰岛素相比,VIAject治疗可减少餐后氧化应激并改善内皮功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号