...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Cost-effectiveness of the diabetes care protocol, a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention that reduces cardiovascular risk.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of the diabetes care protocol, a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention that reduces cardiovascular risk.

机译:糖尿病护理方案的成本效益,多方面的计算机决策支持降低糖尿病风险的糖尿病管理干预措施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The Diabetes Care Protocol (DCP), a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention, reduces cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetic patients. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of DCP from a Dutch health care perspective. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cluster randomized trial provided data of DCP versus usual care. The 1-year follow-up patient data were extrapolated using a modified Dutch microsimulation diabetes model, computing individual lifetime health-related costs, and health effects. Incremental costs and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were estimated using multivariate generalized estimating equations to correct for practice-level clustering and confounding. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were created. Stroke costs were calculated separately. Subgroup analyses examined patients with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD+ or CVD- patients, respectively). RESULTS: Excluding stroke, DCP patients lived longer (0.14 life-years, P = NS), experienced more QALYs (0.037, P = NS), and incurred higher total costs (euro 1,415, P = NS), resulting in an ICER of euro 38,243 per QALY gained. The likelihood of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold of euro 20,000 per QALY gained is 30%. DCP had a more favorable effect on CVD+ patients (ICER = euro 14,814) than for CVD- patients (ICER = euro 121,285). Coronary heart disease costs were reduced (euro-587, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DCP reduces cardiovascular risk, resulting in only a slight improvement in QALYs, lower CVD costs, but higher total costs, with a high cost-effectiveness ratio. Cost-effective care can be achieved by focusing on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients with a history of CVD.
机译:目的:糖尿病护理方案(DCP)是一种多方面的计算机化决策支持糖尿病管理干预措施,可降低2型糖尿病患者的心血管风险。我们从荷兰的医疗保健角度对DCP进行了成本效益分析。研究设计和方法:一项集群随机试验提供了DCP与常规治疗的数据。使用改良的荷兰微观模拟糖尿病模型外推1年随访患者数据,计算个人终生健康相关费用和健康影响。使用多元广义估计方程来估计实践水平的聚类和混淆,以估算增量成本和有效性(质量调整生命年[QALYs])。计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),并创建了成本效益可接受性曲线。行程成本是单独计算的。亚组分析检查了有无心血管疾病的患者(分别为CVD +或CVD-患者)。结果:不包括中风,DCP患者的寿命更长(0.14个生命年,P = NS),经历了更多的QALY(0.037,P = NS),并且产生了更高的总费用(1,415欧元,P = NS),导致ICER为每获得QALY 38,243欧元。在每个QALY获得20,000欧元的支付意愿门槛的情况下,成本效益的可能性为30%。 DCP对CVD +患者(ICER = 14,814欧元)的疗效要优于CVD-患者(ICER = 121,285欧元)。降低了冠心病的费用(euro-587,P <0.05)。结论:DCP降低了心血管疾病的风险,仅导致QALYs的轻微改善,较低的CVD成本,但较高的总成本以及较高的成本效益比。通过关注具有CVD史的2型糖尿病患者的心血管危险因素,可以实现具有成本效益的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号