首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Triple therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine or rosiglitazone added to combination therapy of sulfonylurea plus metformin in insulin-naive patients.
【24h】

Triple therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine or rosiglitazone added to combination therapy of sulfonylurea plus metformin in insulin-naive patients.

机译:2型糖尿病的三联疗法:未使用胰岛素的患者,将甘精胰岛素或罗格列酮加至磺酰脲加二甲双胍的联合治疗中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on insulin glargine versus rosiglitazone in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual oral therapy with sulfonylurea plus metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 24-week multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel trial, 217 patients (HbA(1c) [A1C] 7.5-11%, BMI >25 kg/m(2)) on > or =50% of maximal-dose sulfonylurea and metformin received add-on insulin glargine 10 units/day or rosiglitazone 4 mg/day. Insulin glargine was forced-titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or =5.5-6.7 mmol/l (< or =100-120 mg/dl), and rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day any time after 6 weeks if FPG was >5.5 mmol/l. RESULTS: A1C improvements from baseline were similar in both groups (-1.7 vs. -1.5% for insulin glargine vs. rosiglitazone, respectively); however, when baseline A1C was >9.5%, the reduction of A1C with insulin glargine was greater than with rosiglitazone (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine yielded better FPG values than rosiglitazone (-3.6 +/- 0.23 vs. -2.6 +/- 0.22 mmol/l; P = 0.001). Insulin glargine final dose per day was 38 +/- 26 IU vs. 7.1 +/- 2 mg for rosiglitazone. Confirmed hypoglycemic events at plasma glucose <3.9 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) were slightly greater for the insulin glargine group (n = 57) than for the rosiglitazone group (n = 47) (P = 0.0528). The calculated average rate per patient-year of a confirmed hypoglycemic event (<70 mg/dl), after adjusting for BMI, was 7.7 (95% CI 5.4-10.8) and 3.4 (2.3-5.0) for the insulin glargine and rosiglitazone groups, respectively (P = 0.0073). More patients in the insulin glargine group had confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia of <3.9 mmol/l (P = 0.02) and <2.8 mmol/l (P < 0.05) than in the rosiglitazone group. Effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels from baseline to end point with insulin glargine (-4.4, -1.4, and -19.0%, respectively) contrasted with those of rosiglitazone (+10.1, +13.1, and +4.6%, respectively; P < 0.002). HDL cholesterol was unchanged with insulin glargine but increased with rosiglitazone by 4.4% (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine had less weight gain than rosiglitazone (1.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.4 kg; P = 0.02), fewer adverse events (7 vs. 29%; P = 0.0001), and no peripheral edema (0 vs. 12.5%). Insulin glargine saved Dollars 235/patient over 24 weeks compared with rosiglitazone. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose insulin glargine combined with a sulfonylurea and metformin resulted in similar A1C improvements except for greater reductions in A1C when baseline was > or =9.5% compared with add-on maximum-dose rosiglitazone. Further, insulin glargine was associated with more hypoglycemia but less weight gain, no edema, and salutary lipid changes at a lower cost of therapy.
机译:目的:评价磺脲类药物加二甲双胍联合口服治疗对初治胰岛素不足的2型糖尿病初治胰岛素补充型甘精胰岛素和罗格列酮的疗效和安全性。研究设计与方法:在这项为期24周的多中心,随机,开放标签,平行试验中,≥或= 217例患者(HbA(1c)[A1C] 7.5-11%,BMI> 25 kg / m(2))。 50%的最大剂量磺酰脲和二甲双胍接受追加的甘精胰岛素10单位/天或罗格列酮4 mg /天。甘精胰岛素被强制滴定至目标空腹血糖(FPG)<或= 5.5-6.7 mmol / l(<或= 100-120 mg / dl),如果在6周后的任何时间,罗格列酮增加至8 mg /天FPG> 5.5 mmol / l。结果:两组的基线A1C改善相似(甘精胰岛素比罗格列酮分别为-1.7%和-1.5%);但是,当基线A1C> 9.5%时,甘精胰岛素比罗格列酮对A1C的减少更大(P <0.05)。甘精胰岛素比罗格列酮具有更好的FPG值(-3.6 +/- 0.23对-2.6 +/- 0.22 mmol / l; P = 0.001)。甘精胰岛素的最终每日剂量为38 +/- 26 IU,而罗格列酮为7.1 +/- 2 mg。甘精胰岛素组(n = 57)的血浆葡萄糖<3.9 mmol / l(<70 mg / dl)时确认的降血糖事件略大于罗格列酮组(n = 47)(P = 0.0528)。甘精胰岛素和罗格列酮治疗组的BMI校正后,每位患者每年确诊降血糖事件(<70 mg / dl)的平均平均发生率分别为7.7(95%CI 5.4-10.8)和3.4(2.3-5.0) ,分别为(P = 0.0073)。与罗格列酮组相比,胰岛素甘精胰岛素组中证实的夜间低血糖<3.9 mmol / l(P = 0.02)和<​​2.8 mmol / l(P <0.05)的患者更多。甘精胰岛素从基线到终点对总胆固醇,LDL胆固醇和甘油三酸酯水平的影响(分别为-4.4,-1.4和-19.0%)与罗格列酮的影响(+ 10.1,+ 13.1和+ 4.6%)相比,分别; P <0.002)。甘精胰岛素胰岛素的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇没有变化,但罗格列酮增加了4.4%(P <0.05)。甘精胰岛素的体重增加比罗格列酮少(1.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.4 kg; P = 0.02),不良事件更少(7 vs. 29%; P = 0.0001),并且没有周围性水肿(0 vs 12.5%)。与罗格列酮相比,甘精胰岛素在24周内为每位患者节省了235美元。结论:低剂量的甘精胰岛素联合磺酰脲类和二甲双胍可导致类似的A1C改善,但当基线大于或等于9.5%时,与增加的最大剂量罗格列酮相比,A1C的减少更大。此外,甘精胰岛素与更多的低血糖症有关,但体重增加较少,无水肿和脂蛋白变化,且治疗费用较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号