...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >1,5-anhydroglucitol and postprandial hyperglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system in moderately controlled patients with diabetes.
【24h】

1,5-anhydroglucitol and postprandial hyperglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system in moderately controlled patients with diabetes.

机译:通过连续葡萄糖监测系统在中度控制的糖尿病患者中测得的1,5-脱水葡萄糖醇和餐后高血糖。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Postprandial hyperglycemia is often inadequately assessed in diabetes management. Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) drops as serum glucose rises above the renal threshold for glucose and has been proposed as a marker for postprandial hyperglycemia. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the relationship between 1,5-AG and postprandial hyperglycemia, as assessed by the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in suboptimally controlled patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) (A1C) between 6.5 and 8% with stable glycemic control were recruited from two sites. A CGMS monitor was worn for two consecutive 72-h periods. Mean glucose, mean postmeal maximum glucose (MPMG), and area under the curve for glucose above 180 mg/dl (AUC-180), were compared with 1,5-AG, fructosamine (FA), and A1C at baseline, day 4, and day 7. RESULTS: 1,5-AG varied considerably between patients (6.5 +/- 3.2 mug/ml [means +/- SD]) despite similarA1C (7.3 +/- 0.5%). Mean 1,5-AG (r = -0.45, P = 0.006) correlated with AUC-180 more robustly than A1C (r = 0.33, P = 0.057) or FA (r = 0.38, P = 0.88). MPMG correlated more strongly with 1,5-AG (r = -0.54, P = 0.004) than with A1C (r = 0.40, P = 0.03) or FA (r = 0.32, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: 1,5-AG reflects glycemic excursions, often in the postprandial state, more robustly than A1C or FA. 1,5-AG may be useful as a complementary marker to A1C to assess glycemic control in moderately controlled patients with diabetes.
机译:目的:通常在糖尿病治疗中对餐后高血糖的评估不足。当血清葡萄糖升高至肾脏的葡萄糖阈值以上时,血清1,5-脱水葡萄糖醇(1,5-AG)下降,并已被提议作为餐后高血糖的标志物。这项研究的目的是证明通过持续血糖监测系统(CGMS)在糖尿病患者中控制不佳的情况下1,5-AG与餐后高血糖之间的关系。研究设计与方法:从两个地点招募患有1型或2型糖尿病且HbA(1c)(A1C)在6.5至8%之间且血糖控制稳定的患者。连续两个72小时佩戴CGMS监视器。在第4天的基线时,将平均血糖,平均餐后最大血糖(MPMG)和高于180 mg / dl的血糖曲线下面积(AUC-180)与1,5-AG,果糖胺(FA)和A1C进行比较和第7天。结果:尽管A1C相似(7.3 +/- 0.5%),但患者之间的1,5-AG差异很大(6.5 +/- 3.2杯/毫升[平均值+/- SD])。平均值1,5-AG(r = -0.45,P = 0.006)与AUC-180(r = 0.33,P = 0.057)或FA(r = 0.38,P = 0.88)的相关性更强。与A1C(r = 0.40,P = 0.03)或FA(r = 0.32,P = 0.07)相比,MPMG与1,5-AG(r = -0.54,P = 0.004)相关性更强。结论:1,5-AG比A1C或FA更能反映出血糖波动,通常在餐后状态。 1,5-AG可能用作A1C的补充标记,以评估中度控制的糖尿病患者的血糖控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号