首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination therapy and gabapentin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination therapy and gabapentin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

机译:曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚联合治疗与加巴喷丁治疗糖尿病性神经病变的疗效和安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: This study compared the efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen (T/A) and gabapentin in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: An open, randomized, comparative study was conducted. Subjects with painful symmetric neuropathy in the lower limbs and mean pain-intensity score > or = 4 on a numeric rating scale were eligible. Subjects were randomized to receive either tramadol (37.5 mg)/acetaminophen (325 mg) or gabapentin (300 mg) for 6 weeks. After 2 weeks of the titration period (1200 mg/day for gabapentin and three tablets/day for T/A), the doses were maintained if the pain was relieved. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction in pain intensity. Secondary measures evaluated a pain relief scale, a Brief Pain Inventory, a 36-item Short Form Health Survey, average pain intensity and sleep disturbance. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three subjects (T/A 79; gabapentin 84) were included. At the final visit, the mean doses were 1575 mg/day for gabapentin and 4.22 tablets/day for T/A. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline pain intensity (mean intensity: T/A 6.7 +/- 1.6; gabapentin 6.3 +/- 1.6, P = 0.168). At the final visit, the mean reductions in pain intensity were similar in both groups (T/A -3.1 +/- 2.0; gabapentin -2.7 +/- 2.1, P = 0.744). Both groups had similar improvements in every Short Form Health Survey category and Brief Pain Inventory subcategory, and in the mean pain relief scores. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the T/A combination treatment is as effective as gabapentin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
机译:目的:本研究比较了曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚(T / A)和加巴喷丁在治疗糖尿病性神经病变中的疗效和安全性。方法:进行了一项开放,随机,比较研究。下肢疼痛对称性神经病且平均疼痛强度评分在数字评分量表上大于或等于4的受试者符合条件。将受试者随机接受曲马多(37.5 mg)/对乙酰氨基酚(325 mg)或加巴喷丁(300 mg)6周。滴定2周后(加巴喷丁为1200 mg /天,T / A为3片/天),如果疼痛缓解,则维持剂量。主要功效结果是减轻疼痛强度。次级措施评估了疼痛缓解量表,简短疼痛量表,36项简短健康调查,平均疼痛强度和睡眠障碍。结果:包括163名受试者(T / A 79;加巴喷丁84)。在最后一次就诊时,加巴喷丁的平均剂量为1575毫克/天,T / A的平均剂量为4.22片/天。两组的基线疼痛强度相似(平均强度:T / A 6.7 +/- 1.6;加巴喷丁6.3 +/- 1.6,P = 0.168)。在最后一次就诊时,两组患者的疼痛强度平均降低程度相似(T / A -3.1 +/- 2.0;加巴喷丁-2.7 +/- 2.1,P = 0.744)。两组在每个“简短健康调查”类别和“简短疼痛清单”子类别以及平均疼痛缓解评分方面都有相似的改善。结论:这项研究表明,T / A联合治疗与加巴喷丁治疗2型糖尿病患者的疼痛性糖尿病神经病一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号