...
首页> 外文期刊>Desalination: The International Journal on the Science and Technology of Desalting and Water Purification >Multi-objective optimization of reverse osmosis networks by lexicographic optimization and augmented epsilon constraint method
【24h】

Multi-objective optimization of reverse osmosis networks by lexicographic optimization and augmented epsilon constraint method

机译:词典编纂和增强ε约束方法对反渗透网络进行多目标优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study proposes a multi-objective optimization (MOO) of reverse osmosis (RO) networks for seawater desalination. The membrane transport modeltakes into consideration of the longitudinal variation of the velocity, the pressure, and the concentration in the membrane modules. The RO network with three type energy recovery device options (pressure exchanger (PX), Hydraulic Turbocharger, and turbine) is introduced. Lexicographic optimization (for calculation of a more effective payoff table) and augmented e-constraint method (to avoid inefficient Pareto solutions) are proposed to solve the MOO problem. A fuzzy decision maker is introduced to derive the most efficient solution among Pareto-optimal solutions. Firstly, different energy recovery option studies show that using PX is seen to be the most profitable option. Exergy analysis is used to evaluate the contribution of the equipments in energy degradation. Secondly, the proposed multi-objective framework simultaneously optimizes the total annualized cost (TAC) and energy consumption. With the increases of weighting for the main objective function: TAC, the most efficient solution moves to lower TAC direction. Finally, system recovery rate is added as the third objective function. It is reasonable to stay at the appropriate system recovery rather than to increase up to its limit and generating high energetic losses.
机译:这项研究提出了用于海水淡化的反渗透(RO)网络的多目标优化(MOO)。膜传输模型考虑了膜组件中速度,压力和浓度的纵向变化。介绍了具有三种类型的能量回收设备选项(压力交换器(PX),液压涡轮增压器和涡轮机)的RO网络。为了解决MOO问题,提出了词典优化(用于计算更有效的收益表)和增强电子约束方法(以避免效率低下的帕累托解)。引入了模糊决策器以推导帕累托最优解中最有效的解。首先,不同的能源回收方案研究表明,使用PX被认为是最有利可图的方案。火用分析用于评估设备在能量​​降解中的作用。其次,提出的多目标框架同时优化了总年度成本(TAC)和能源消耗。随着主要目标功能(TAC)权重的增加,最有效的解决方案向较低的TAC方向发展。最后,将系统恢复率作为第三个目标函数。保持适当的系统恢复而不是增加到极限并产生高能量损失是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号