首页> 外文期刊>Depression and anxiety >PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY FOR SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER:AN EFFICACY AND PARTIAL EFFECTIVENESS TRIAL
【24h】

PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY FOR SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER:AN EFFICACY AND PARTIAL EFFECTIVENESS TRIAL

机译:心理焦虑症对心理焦虑行为的心理治疗:有效性和部分有效性试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives:Comparing the overall and differential effects of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) versus cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Design:Patients with a primary SAD (N = 47) were randomly assigned to PDT (N = 22) or CBT (N = 27). Both PDT and CBT consisted of up to 36 sessions (average PDT 31.4 and CBT 19.8 sessions). Assessments took place at waitlist:pretest, after 12 and 24 weeks for those who received longer treatment:posttest, 3-month and 1-year follow-up. Methods:Changes in the main outcome measure self-reported social anxiety composite, as well as in other psychopathology, social skills, negative social beliefs, public self-consciousness, defense mechanisms, personal goals, independent rater's judgments of SAD and general improvement, and approach behavior during an objective test, were analyzed using multilevel analysis. Results:No improvement occurred during waitlist. Treatments were highly efficacious, with large within-subject effect sizes for social anxiety, but no differences between PDT and CBT on general and treatment-specific measures occurred. Remission rates were over 50% and similar for PDT and CBT. Personality disorders did not influence the effects of PDT or CBT. Conclusions:PDT and CBT are both effective approaches for SAD. Further research is needed on the cost-effectiveness of PDT versus CBT, on different lengths PDT, and on patient preferences and their relationship to outcome of PDT versus CBT.
机译:目的:比较心理动力心理治疗(PDT)与认知行为疗法(CBT)对社交焦虑症(SAD)的总体和差异效果。设计:将具有主要SAD(N = 47)的患者随机分配给PDT(N = 22)或CBT(N = 27)。 PDT和CBT均由多达36场会议组成(平均PDT 31.4和CBT 19.8场会议)。对于接受更长治疗的患者,在等待清单:预测试,12周和24周后进行评估:后测试,3个月和1年的随访。方法:主要结局的变化可衡量自我报告的社交焦虑综合水平,以及其他心理病理学,社交技能,否定的社会信念,公众自我意识,防御机制,个人目标,独立评估者对SAD的判断和总体改善的变化,以及使用多级分析对客观测试过程中的进近行为进行了分析。结果:候补名单期间没有任何改善。治疗是高效的,对社交焦虑症的受试者内部效应大小较大,但PDT和CBT在一般和特定治疗措施上没有差异。 PDT和CBT的缓解率超过50%,与之相似。人格障碍不影响PDT或CBT的影响。结论:PDT和CBT都是SAD的有效方法。需要进一步研究PDT与CBT的成本效益,不同长度的PDT,以及患者的喜好及其与PDT与CBT结局的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号