...
首页> 外文期刊>Zoological Studies >Sexual Size and Shape Dimorphism in an Agamid Lizard, Japalura swinhonis (Squamata: Lacertilia: Agamidae)
【24h】

Sexual Size and Shape Dimorphism in an Agamid Lizard, Japalura swinhonis (Squamata: Lacertilia: Agamidae)

机译:Agamid蜥蜴(Japalura swinhonis)中的性大小和形状异形(鳞状:Lacertilia:Agamidae)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sexual dimorphism in size and shape is a widespread phenomenon in the animal kingdom. Sexual dimorphism in morphology can be explained in proximate (growth pattern/sampling effects) and ultimate (evolutionary payoffs) contexts. There are 3 mutually non-exclusive hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: fecundity advantage, intersexual resource partitioning, and sexual selection, each of which can make specific predictions regarding a lizard's morphology. In this study, we describe sexual dimorphism in size and shape in an agamid lizard, Japalura swinhonis, with discussions from both proximate and ultimate perspectives. The results showed that all body parts of males were larger than those of females. After the effect of body size was accounted for, males had proportionately longer and wider heads, and shorter limbs and body length. Sexual shape dimorphism can be proximately explained by different growth patterns between the 2 sexes. We found a correlation between morphology and perch habitat, but not between morphology and diet since the 2 sexes exhibited extensive dietary overlap. Our results rejected the resource partitioning hypothesis and provided support for the fecundity advantage hypothesis as the underlying mechanisms of sexual dimorphism in J. swinhonis. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/48.3/351 .pdf
机译:大小和形状上的性二态性是动物界中普遍存在的现象。形态上的性二态性可以在接近(增长模式/采样效应)和最终(进化收益)的背景下进行解释。对于性二态性的进化,存在三种互不排斥的假说:生殖力优势,两性资源分配和性选择,每一个都可以对蜥蜴的形态做出特定的预测。在这项研究中,我们描述了蜥蜴Japalura swinhonis在大小和形状上的性二态性,并从近端和最终角度进行了讨论。结果表明,男性的所有身体部位均大于女性。考虑到身材大小的影响后,男性的头部比例相应地更长和更宽,四肢和体长也较短。可以通过两个性别之间不同的生长方式来直接解释性别形状的二态性。我们发现形态与栖息地之间存在相关性,但形态与饮食之间没有相关性,因为这两个性别在饮食上有广泛的重叠。我们的结果拒绝了资源分配假说,并为繁殖力优势假说提供了支持。 http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/48.3/351 .pdf

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号