首页> 外文期刊>Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie >[EUS-FNA: how to improve biopsy results? An evidence based review].
【24h】

[EUS-FNA: how to improve biopsy results? An evidence based review].

机译:[EUS-FNA:如何改善活检结果?循证审查]。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Endosonography with fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) has become a widespreadly available clinical tool to diagnose numerous different lesions in humans. EUS-FNA is frequently used for tissue-based diagnoses such as lymphatic diseases (ranging from tuberculosis / sarcoidosis to malignant lymphoma) or solid tumors (such as pancreatic carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, sub-epithelial gastrointestinal tumors and others). Outcomes of EUS-FNA results, however, vary which is caused by several different factors ranging from experience of the endoscopist over technical factors such as use of stylet or suction for puncture through the skills of the cyto-pathologist who takes care of the specimen obtained by EUS-FNA. Though introduced since more than 20 years ago EUS-FNA has still not yet been perfectionized and several issues remain controversial among endoscopist. These issues include needle size and type (FNA versus TNB needles), use of a stylet and suction for FNA sampling, pure cytologic assessment versus cyto-histologic techniques, grading of the investigator′s and pathologist′s experience and improvement of EUS training for novices. In this report we briefly review the actual literature and summarize the available evidence on some controversely discussed issues. The results support the view that use of a stylet rarely aids to increase the amount of tissue obtained during EUS-FNA, whereas use of suction can be helpful in certain situations. Novel cutting needles may potentially improve number and size of core biopsies that can be rendered for special histologic tissue processing techniques. An in-room-cytopathologist not necessarily improves outcome of EUS-FNA results but may have a role during build-up of EUS units to become more successful. EUS-FNA education requires skilled endoscopists on both sides and can presumably be improved by objective testing of practical expertise by peer review and introducing objective sampling parameters. Novel techniques and equipment are about to evolve in the near future.
机译:超声内镜细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)已成为诊断人类众多不同病变的临床工具。 EUS-FNA通常用于基于组织的诊断,例如淋巴疾病(从结核/结节病到恶性淋巴瘤)或实体瘤(例如胰腺癌,神经内分泌肿瘤,上皮下消化道肿瘤等)。然而,EUS-FNA结果的结果各不相同,这是由几种不同的因素引起的,从内镜医师的经验到技术因素,例如使用探针或吸管进行穿刺,以及通过细胞病理学家的技术来处理所获得的标本由EUS-FNA。尽管EUS-FNA自20多年前就已推出,但仍未完善,内镜医师之间仍存在一些争议。这些问题包括针头的大小和类型(FNA与TNB针头),使用探针和吸管进行FNA采样,纯细胞学评估与细胞组织学技术,研究者和病理学家的经验分级以及对EUS培训的改进新手。在本报告中,我们简要回顾了实际文献并总结了一些有争议的问题的可用证据。结果支持这样的观点,即使用探针在EUS-FNA期间极少有助于增加组织的数量,而在某些情况下使用吸管可能会有所帮助。新型切割针可能会改善可用于特殊组织学组织处理技术的核心活检的数量和大小。室内细胞病理学家不一定能改善EUS-FNA结果的结果,但可能在EUS单元的建立过程中发挥作用,从而变得更加成功。 EUS-FNA教育需要双方熟练的内镜医师,并且可以通过同行评审对客观专业知识进行客观测试并引入客观采样参数来改善。新技术和设备将在不久的将来发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号