首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology
【24h】

Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology

机译:使用Q方法确定莱茵河流域未来洪水管理的利益相关者观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article identifies different stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the downstream parts of the Rhine basin in Germany and The Netherlands. The perspectives were identified using Q methodology, which proved to be a good, but time-intensive, method for eliciting and analyzing stakeholder perspectives in a structured and unbiased way. Three shared perspectives were found: A) "Anticipation and institutions", B) "Space for flooding" and C) "Knowledge and engineering". These three perspectives share a central concern for the provision of safety against flooding, but disagree on the expected autonomous developments and the preferred measures. In perspective A, the expected climate change and economic growth call for fast action. To deal with the increasing flood risk, mostly institutional measures are proposed, such as the development of a stronger basin commission. In perspective B, an increasing spatial pressure on the river area is expected, and the proposed measures are focused on mitigating damage, e. g., through controlled flooding and compartmentalization. In perspective C, the role of expert knowledge and technological improvements is emphasized. Preferred strategies include strengthening the dikes and differentiation of safety standards. An overview of stakeholder perspectives can be useful in natural resources management for 1) setting the research agenda, 2) identifying differences in values and interests that need to be discussed, 3) creating awareness among a broad range of stakeholders, and 4) developing scenarios.
机译:本文确定了利益相关者对德国和荷兰莱茵河流域下游地区未来洪水管理的不同观点。使用Q方法确定了观点,事实证明这是一种很好的方法,但需要大量时间,可以以结构化且公正的方式得出和分析利益相关者的观点。发现了三个共同的观点:A)“预期和制度”,B)“洪水泛滥的空间”和C)“知识与工程”。在提供防洪安全方面,这三个观点有着共同的关注点,但是在预期的自治发展和首选措施上却意见分歧。在观点A中,预期的气候变化和经济增长需要采取迅速行动。为了应对不断增加的洪灾风险,主要提出了体制措施,例如建立更强大的流域委员会。在视角B中,预计河流区域的空间压力会增加,并且拟议的措施集中在减轻破坏上,例如:例如,通过控制洪水和分隔。在视角C中,强调了专家知识和技术改进的作用。首选策略包括加强堤防和区分安全标准。利益相关者观点的概述在以下方面可能有用:1)设定研究议程; 2)识别需要讨论的价值和利益差异; 3)在广泛的利益相关者之间建立意识; 4)开发方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号