首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Carotid pressure is a better predictor of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressure.
【24h】

Carotid pressure is a better predictor of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressure.

机译:颈动脉压比肱动脉压更好地预测了冠状动脉疾病的严重程度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The mechanisms relating pulse pressure to cardiovascular outcome may include surrogacy for coronary disease severity. Although pulse pressure is typically measured at the brachial artery, central pulse pressure and its principal determinant, large-artery stiffness, may relate more closely to disease severity. This study aimed to determine the relationships between large-artery stiffness and carotid and brachial blood pressures and coronary artery disease severity. One hundred fourteen male patients with coronary artery disease (age 60+/-8 years, mean+/-SD) and 57 age-matched healthy male controls (age 59+/-9 years) were recruited. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on the magnitude of their maximum coronary stenosis: moderate (50% to 89%) and severe (>/=90%). Large-artery stiffness was assessed as systemic arterial compliance and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Mean pressure was not different between the 3 groups. Systemic compliance and carotid pulse pressure were significantly different between all 3 groups, with compliance lowest and pressure highest in the severe group (P<0.05). Pulse wave velocity was higher in patients with severe stenosis than in those with moderate stenosis (P<0.01) and those in the control group (P<0.001). Brachial pulse pressure was higher in patients than in controls (P<0.05), but there was no difference between the 2 disease groups. In separate multivariate analyses, carotid pressures and systemic arterial compliance were determinants of coronary artery disease severity, independent of age, smoking status, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cholesterol levels (total, LDL, and HDL), triglycerides, and beta-antagonist and lipid-lowering therapy (P<0.001), whereas brachial pressures and pulse wave velocity were not. In conclusion, central blood pressures and systemic arterial compliance are more sensitive markers of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressures.
机译:将脉压与心血管预后相关的机制可能包括代孕冠心病的严重程度。尽管通常在肱动脉处测量脉压,但中心脉压及其主要决定因素大动脉僵硬度可能与疾病严重程度更为相关。这项研究旨在确定大动脉僵硬度和颈动脉与肱动脉血压与冠状动脉疾病严重程度之间的关系。招募了114名患有冠状动脉疾病的男性患者(60 +/- 8岁,平均+/- SD)和57名年龄匹配的健康男性对照(59 +/- 9岁)。根据患者最大冠状动脉狭窄程度将其分为两组:中度(50%至89%)和重度(> / = 90%)。大动脉僵硬度被评估为全身动脉顺应性和颈股脉搏波速度。 3组之间的平均压力没有差异。三组的系统顺应性和颈动脉脉压均存在显着差异,重度组的顺应性最低和压力最高(P <0.05)。重度狭窄患者的脉搏波速度高于中度狭窄患者(P <0.01)和对照组(P <0.001)。患者的臂脉压高于对照组(P <0.05),但两个疾病组之间没有差异。在单独的多元分析中,颈动脉压和全身动脉顺应性是冠状动脉疾病严重程度的决定因素,与年龄,吸烟状况,体重指数,平均动脉压,心率,胆固醇水平(总,低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白),甘油三酯,和β-拮抗剂和降脂治疗(P <0.001),而肱动脉压和脉搏波速度则不然。总之,中心血压和全身动脉顺应性比肱动脉压力是冠状动脉疾病严重程度的更敏感标志。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号