首页> 外文期刊>Human nature: an interdisciplinary biosocial perspective >Managing the Urban Commons: The Relative Influence of Individual and Social Incentives on the Treatment of Public Space
【24h】

Managing the Urban Commons: The Relative Influence of Individual and Social Incentives on the Treatment of Public Space

机译:管理城市公共空间:个人和社会激励措施对公共空间处理的相对影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All communities have common resources that are vulnerable to selfish motives. The current paper explores this challenge in the specific case of the urban commons, defined as the public spaces and scenery of city neighborhoods. A theoretical model differentiates between individual incentives and social incentives for caring for the commons. The quality of a commons is defined as the level of physical (e. g., loose garbage) and social (e. g., public disturbances) disorder. A first study compared levels of disorder across the census block groups of a single city; the second compared the disorder generated by individual addresses in two neighborhoods. Each study found that homeownership, an individual incentive, was the main predictor of disorder. Owner-occupied parcels generated less disorder than their renter-occupied neighbors, but both parcel types produced less disorder in a neighborhood with greater homeownership. The results emphasize the need for considering both individual and social incentives for group-beneficial behaviors.
机译:所有社区都有共同的资源,容易受到自私动机的伤害。本文在特定的城市公共空间案例中探讨了这一挑战,城市公共空间定义为城市公共空间和城市社区景观。理论模型区分照顾公地的个人动机和社会动机。公地的质量定义为身体(例如,松散的垃圾)和社会(例如,公共骚扰)疾病的水平。第一项研究比较了单个城市人口普查区组的混乱程度;第二个比较了由两个社区中的单个地址产生的混乱。每项研究都发现,房屋所有权是个人的诱因,它是疾病的主要预测指标。业主居住的包裹所产生的混乱情况要少于其租房者所居住的邻居,但两种包裹类型在拥有更大房屋所有权的社区中产生的混乱程度都较小。结果强调需要考虑对群体有益行为的个人和社会激励。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号