...
首页> 外文期刊>Human brain mapping >Differences in structural covariance brain networks between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
【24h】

Differences in structural covariance brain networks between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

机译:行为变异额颞痴呆与阿尔茨海默氏病之间的结构协方差大脑网络的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Disease-specific patterns of gray matter atrophy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) overlap with distinct structural covariance networks (SCNs) in cognitively healthy controls. This suggests that both types of dementia target specific structural networks. Here, we study SCNs in AD and bvFTD. We used structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 31 AD patients, 24 bvFTD patients, and 30 controls from two centers specialized in dementia. Ten SCNs were defined based on structural covariance of gray matter density using independent component analysis. We studied group differences in SCNs using F-tests, with Bonferroni corrected t-tests, adjusted for age, gender, and study center. Associations with cognitive performance were studied using linear regression analyses. Cross-sectional group differences were found in three SCNs (all P<0.0025). In bvFTD, we observed decreased anterior cingulate network integrity compared with AD and controls. Patients with AD showed decreased precuneal network integrity compared with bvFTD and controls, and decreased hippocampal network and anterior cingulate network integrity compared with controls. In AD, we found an association between precuneal network integrity and global cognitive performance (P=0.0043). Our findings show that AD and bvFTD target different SCNs. The comparison of both types of dementia showed decreased precuneal (i.e., default mode) network integrity in AD and decreased anterior cingulate (i.e., salience) network integrity in bvFTD. This confirms the hypothesis that AD and bvFTD have distinct anatomical networks of degeneration and shows that structural covariance gives valuable insights in the understanding of network pathology in dementia. Hum Brain Mapp 37:978-988, 2016. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和行为变异额颞痴呆(bvFTD)的特定疾病灰质萎缩模式与认知健康对照中的独特结构协方差网络(SCN)重叠。这表明两种类型的痴呆都针对特定的结构网络。在这里,我们研究AD和bvFTD中的SCN。我们使用来自两个痴呆症中心的31名AD患者,24名bvFTD患者和30名对照的结构磁共振成像数据。使用独立成分分析,根据灰质密度的结构协方差定义了十个SCN。我们使用F检验和Bonferroni校正的t检验(根据年龄,性别和学习中心进行了调整)研究了SCN中的组差异。使用线性回归分析研究与认知表现的关联。在三个SCN中发现了横断面组差异(所有P <0.0025)。在bvFTD中,我们观察到与AD和对照相比前扣带回网络完整性降低。与bvFTD和对照组相比,AD患者的前神经网络完整性降低,与对照组相比,海马网络和前扣带回网络完整性降低。在公元中,我们发现了precuneal网络完整性和全球认知表现之间的关联(P = 0.0043)。我们的发现表明,AD和bvFTD靶向不同的SCN。两种类型的痴呆症的比较显示,AD中的先觉(即默认模式)网络完整性降低,而bvFTD中的前扣带回(即显着性)网络完整性降低。这证实了AD和bvFTD具有明显的变性变性网络的假设,并表明结构协方差为了解痴呆症的网络病理学提供了有价值的见解。嗡嗡声大脑Mapp 37:978-988,2016.(c)2015 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号