首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Evaluation of Biopolymer-coated Fiber Containers for Container-grown Plants
【24h】

Evaluation of Biopolymer-coated Fiber Containers for Container-grown Plants

机译:用于容器种植植物的生物聚合物涂层纤维容器的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biocontainers made of coconut coir, paper, peat, wood, or other natural fibers are considered sustainable alternatives to containers made of petroleum-based plastics, but growers' acceptance and use of fiber containers have been limited by their comparatively high cost, low strength and durability, and poor water-use efficiency (WUE). We hypothesized that coating fiber containers with biopolymers would improve their strength, durability, and WUE during plant production. We compared the effectivenessof fiber containers of coir, paper, and wood that were either uncoated or coated with one of four biopolymers [polyamide (PA), polylactic acid (PLA), polyurethane (PU), or tung oil (TO)], peat-fiber containers that were uncoated, and injection-molded containers made of petroleum-based plastic. Ease of coating was assessed, along with the cost and strength of containers, their effectiveness during greenhouse production of 'Honeycomb' marigold (Tagetes patula), 'Autumn Bell' pepper (Capisicum annuum), 'Madness Red' petunia {Petunia xhybrida), 'St. John's Fire' salvia (Salvia splendens), and 'Rutgers' tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and their WUE during production of salvia and tomato. Castor oil-based PU was the least expensive biopolymer coating and waseasy to apply as a water-based dispersion. The other biopolymers required a hazardous and costly organic solvent (e.g., chloroform). Coatings of PA, PLA, and PU increased container strength and durability, and improved WUE during plant production. Coatedpaper-fiber containers resisted horizontal compression better than petroleum-plastic containers. Greenhouse-grown plants in containers coated with PA, PLA, or PU were larger and rated healthier and of better quality than plants grown in uncoated or TO-coated fiber containers. Plants grown in paper- and coir-fiber containers coated with PA, PLA, or PU were similar in health and size to plants grown in petroleum-plastic containers. Two coatings of PU on paper-fiber containers resulted in WUE similar to that of petroleum-plastic containers for both 4- to 5-inch and gallon sizes. Coating fiber containers with biopolymers slowed, but did not halt, their degradation in soil, indicating that decomposition in soil may be a suitable end-of-life option for biopolymer-coated fiber containers. Our results support the hypothesis that coating fiber containers with biopolymers can improve their effectiveness for crop production, while maintaining an improvement in sustainability over petroleum plastic. Paper-fibercontainers coated with PU showed particular promise and were similar in material cost and performance to containers made of petroleum-based plastic.
机译:由椰子椰壳,纸,泥煤,木材或其他天然纤维制成的生物容器被认为是石油基塑料容器可持续的替代品,但是由于其相对较高的成本,较低的强度和较低的成本,种植者对纤维容器的接受和使用受到了限制。耐用性和差的用水效率(WUE)。我们假设用生物聚合物涂覆纤维容器会提高植物生产过程中的强度,耐久性和WUE。我们比较了未涂覆或未涂覆四种生物聚合物[聚酰胺(PA),聚乳酸(PLA),聚氨酯(PU)或桐油(TO)],泥炭的椰壳纤维,纸纤维和木材纤维容器的有效性-无涂层的纤维容器,以及由石油基塑料制成的注模容器。评估了涂层的易用性,以及容器的成本和强度,温室生产“蜂窝”万寿菊(Tagetes patula),“秋钟”胡椒(Capisicum annuum),“疯红”矮牵牛(Petunia xhybrida), '圣John's Fire的鼠尾草(Salvia splendens)和'Rutgers'番茄(Solanum lycopersicum),以及在鼠尾草和番茄生产过程中的WUE。蓖麻油基聚氨酯是最便宜的生物聚合物涂料,并且易于以水基分散体形式应用。其他生物聚合物需要危险且昂贵的有机溶剂(例如氯仿)。 PA,PLA和PU的涂层提高了容器的强度和耐用性,并在工厂生产过程中提高了WUE。涂布纸纤维容器比石油塑料容器更能抵抗水平压缩。与未涂覆或TO涂覆的纤维容器中生长的植物相比,涂覆有PA,PLA或PU的容器中的温室植物更大且等级更高,且质量更高。在涂有PA,PLA或PU的纸纤维和椰壳纤维容器中生长的植物在健康和大小上与在石油塑料容器中生长的植物相似。纸纤维容器上的两种PU涂层产生的WUE与石油塑料容器的WUE相似,适用于4至5英寸和加仑尺寸。用生物聚合物涂覆的纤维容器在土壤中的降解速度有所减缓,但并未停止,这表明在土壤中分解可能是涂覆生物聚合物的纤维容器的合适的报废选择。我们的结果支持这样的假设,即用生物聚合物涂覆纤维容器可以提高其对农作物生产的有效性,同时保持优于石油塑料的可持续性。涂有PU的纸质纤维容器显示出了特别的前景,并且在材料成本和性能方面与石油基塑料容器相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号