首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pharmacy. >Original Article Retrospective Analysis of Levetiracetam Compared to Phenytoin for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury
【24h】

Original Article Retrospective Analysis of Levetiracetam Compared to Phenytoin for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury

机译:左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠对成年人脑外伤的癫痫预防的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background: Phenytoin is standard of care for seizure prophylaxis following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Levetiracetam, an alternative antiepileptic drug, is utilized for seizure prophylaxis despite limited data supporting its use.Objective: Our primary outcome was post-TBI seizure activity measured by electroencephalogram (EEG) for levetiracetam versus phenytoin. Secondary outcomes were length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, requirement for additional antiepileptic drugs (AED), and drug and monitoring costs. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients admitted to neurosurgical or surgical trauma ICU. Adult patients with at least 1 day of EEG monitoring were included. Patients were excluded if they had history of epilepsy, prior TBI, less than 48 hours of AED therapy, or additional AED prior to EEG monitoring.Results: A total 90 patients met inclusion criteria, with 18 receiving levetiracetam and 72 receiving phenytoin. Prevalence of EEG-confirmed seizure activity was similar between the levetiracetam and phenytoin groups (28% vs 29%; P = .99). ICU length of stay (13 vs 18 days; P = .28), time to EEG-confirmed seizure activity (4 vs 6 days; P = .24), and duration of seizure prophylaxis (9 vs 14 days; P = .18) were also similar. The median daily cost of levetiracetam therapy was $43 compared to $55 for phenytoin therapy and monitoring (P = .08). When all anticonvulsant therapy and monitoring were included, costs were lower for the levetiracetam group ($45 vs $83; P = .02). Conclusion: Levetiracetam may provide an alternative treatment option for seizure prevention in TBI patients in the ICU. Total antiepileptic drug and monitoring costs were lower for levetiracetam patients.
机译:摘要背景:苯妥英钠是预防脑外伤(TBI)后癫痫发作的标准治疗方法。左乙拉西坦,一种替代的抗癫痫药,尽管支持使用的数据有限,但仍用于预防癫痫发作。目的:我们的主要结果是通过脑电图(EEG)测定左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠的TBI发作后的癫痫发作活性。次要结果是重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间,需要额外的抗癫痫药(AED)以及药物和监测费用。方法:对接受神经外科或外科创伤性ICU的患者进行回顾性审查。包括至少监测1天的EEG的成年患者。如果患者有癫痫病史,之前的TBI,少于48小时的AED治疗或在进行EEG监测之前进行了其他AED,则被排除。结果:共有90例患者符合入选标准,其中18例接受左乙拉西坦和72例接受苯妥英钠。在左乙拉西坦和苯妥英钠组中,脑电图证实的癫痫发作活动的患病率相似(28%比29%; P = .99)。 ICU住院时间(13 vs 18天; P = 0.28),达到脑电图证实的癫痫发作时间(4 vs 6天; P = 0.24)以及预防癫痫发作的持续时间(9 vs 14天; P = 0.18) )也相似。左乙拉西坦治疗的每日平均费用为43美元,而苯妥英钠治疗和监测的每日平均费用为55美元(P = .08)。包括所有抗惊厥治疗和监测在内,左乙拉西坦组的费用较低($ 45 vs $ 83; P = .02)。结论:左乙拉西坦可能为ICU的TBI患者预防癫痫发作提供另一种治疗选择。左乙拉西坦患者的总抗癫痫药和监测费用较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号