...
首页> 外文期刊>HPB: the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association >Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in elderly subjects: splenic vessel sacrifice may be associated with a higher rate of splenic infarction.
【24h】

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in elderly subjects: splenic vessel sacrifice may be associated with a higher rate of splenic infarction.

机译:老年患者腹腔镜保留脾远端胰切除术:脾脏血管牺牲可能与脾梗死发生率增高有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy has gained popularity in recent years. Splenic preservation can be achieved with or without splenic vessel preservation (SVP). The potential morbidity of this approach in patients aged >70 years has not been well defined. METHODS: Ten patients aged >70 years underwent attempted laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy within a 2-year period. Multiple patient parameters were examined and chi-squared analysis was used to evaluate the association between the operative technique (SVP or splenic vessel division [SVD]) and splenic infarction. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the SVP and SVD groups with regard to age, estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time, splenic volume and length of stay (LoS). RESULTS: Median age was 81 years (range: 71-92 years). Operating room time, LoS, EBL and complication rates were similar to those reported in published series of younger patients. In four patients, the splenic vessels were divided in a manner relying on short gastric collateral flow; SVP was achieved in all other patients. All four patients who underwent SVD developed splenic infarcts and three required splenectomy to manage this (P=0.002). Median LoS was increased in the SVD group (9.3 days vs. 4.3 days; P=0.053). Estimated blood loss was higher in the SVP group (200 ml vs. 100 ml; P=0.091). One pancreatic leak occurred. There were no mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be performed safely in elderly patients, with results comparable with those achieved in younger subjects. However, elderly patients undergoing division of the splenic artery and vein may be at higher risk for splenic infarct and the aetiology of this is unclear.
机译:背景:腹腔镜保脾远端胰切除术近年来已获得普及。有或没有脾脏血管保存(SVP)均可实现脾脏保存。对于70岁以上的患者,这种方法的潜在发病率尚未明确。方法:10名年龄> 70岁的患者在两年内尝试行腹腔镜保留脾远端胰腺切除术。检查了多个患者参数,并使用卡方分析评估了手术技术(SVP或脾血管分裂[SVD])与脾梗死之间的关联。使用Mann-Whitney检验比较SVP和SVD组的年龄,估计失血量(EBL),手术时间,脾脏体积和住院时间(LoS)。结果:中位年龄为81岁(范围:71-92岁)。手术室时间,LoS,EBL和并发症发生率与已发表的一系列年轻患者中报道的相似。在四例患者中,脾脏血管是依靠短的胃侧支流分流的。所有其他患者均达到SVP。所有接受SVD的四名患者均发生了脾梗塞,其中三名需要行脾切除术以解决这一问题(P = 0.002)。 SVD组中位数LoS升高(9.3天vs. 4.3天; P = 0.053)。 SVP组的估计失血量更高(200 ml对100 ml; P = 0.091)。发生了一次胰腺泄漏。没有死亡。结论:老年患者可以安全地进行保留脾的腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术,其结果与年轻受试者相当。但是,接受脾动脉和静脉分裂的老年患者可能有较高的脾梗塞风险,其病因尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号