首页> 外文期刊>Histopathology: Official Journal of the British Division of the International Academy of Pathology >Comparison of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia with WHO endometrial hyperplasia classification system. A comparative study of 150 cases.
【24h】

Comparison of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia with WHO endometrial hyperplasia classification system. A comparative study of 150 cases.

机译:子宫内膜上皮内瘤变与WHO子宫内膜增生分类系统的比较。 150例比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Endometrial hyperplasia is a common disease. The wide range of histopathological presentations of endometrial hyperplasia is accompanied by high intra- and interobserver variability in diagnostic classification. The World Health Organization (WHO) (1994) classification of endometrial hyperplasia is plagued by poor diagnostic reproducibility and suboptimal prognostic prediction, particularly with regard to the presence or absence of cytological atypia.1 The fixed concept of cytological 'atypia' does not accommodate changes in cytology caused by the ambient hormonal state. Since 1961 many classifications of endometrial hyperplasia have been made and in 1994, to overcome confusion and controversy, the WHO formulated a new classification.
机译:子宫内膜增生是一种常见疾病。子宫内膜增生的广泛组织病理学表现伴随着诊断内和观察者间的高变异性。世界卫生组织(WHO)(1994)对子宫内膜增生的分类受到诊断再现性差和预后不佳的预测困扰,特别是在存在或不存在细胞学异型性方面。1细胞学异型性的固定概念不适应变化细胞学检查是由周围激素状态引起的。自1961年以来,对子宫内膜增生进行了许多分类,1994年,为克服困惑和争议,WHO制定了新的分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号