首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Performance-based contracting in home-care work in The Netherlands: professionalism under pressure?
【24h】

Performance-based contracting in home-care work in The Netherlands: professionalism under pressure?

机译:荷兰基于绩效的家庭护理工作承包:专业化在压力下?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our aim was to improve the understanding of the relationships between performance-based contracting, management supportiveness and professionalism in home care. Using path analysis, this article explores the relationships between home-care workers' perceptions of management support, implementation of performance-based contracting (i.e. use of strict time registration rules and cost-efficiency measures) and autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction. We hypothesised that: use of strict time registration rules and cost-efficiency measures relates to lower levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H1); there is an indirect relationship between use of strict time registration rules and use of cost-efficiency measures and intrinsic job satisfaction via autonomy (H2); higher levels of management support relate to the use of looser time registration rules and less use of cost-efficiency measures (H3); and higher levels of management support relate to higher levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H4). We used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2010 of a sample of Dutch home-care workers (N=156, response rate=34%). Overall, our study suggests that the consequences of performance-based contracting for professionalism are ambiguous. More specifically, using strict time registration rules is related to lower levels of autonomy, whereas using cost-efficiency measures does not seem to affect autonomy (H1). Performance-based contracting has no consequences for the level of fulfilment home-care workers find in their job, as neither of the two contracting dimensions measured was directly or indirectly related to intrinsic job satisfaction (H1, H2). The role of managers must be taken into account when studying performance-based contracting, because perceived higher management support is related to managers' less frequent use of both strict time registration rules and of cost-efficiency measures (H3). The insight we gained into the importance of supportive managers for both autonomy and job satisfaction (H4) can help home-care organisations improve the attractiveness of home-care work.
机译:我们的目的是增进对家庭护理中基于绩效的合同,管理支持和专业性之间关系的理解。本文使用路径分析探索了家庭护理人员对管理支持的看法,基于绩效的合同的实施(即使用严格的时间注册规则和成本效益措施)与自主权和内在工作满意度之间的关系。我们假设:使用严格的时间注册规则和成本效率措施会降低自主性和内在工作满意度(H1);在使用严格的时间注册规则与使用成本效益措施以及通过自主性进行的内部工作满意度之间存在间接关系(H2);高水平的管理支持与宽松的时间登记规则的使用有关,而成本效益措施的使用较少(H3);更高水平的管理支持与更高水平的自主性和内在工作满意度(H4)有关。我们使用了2010年对荷兰家庭护理人员抽样调查的数据(N = 156,回复率= 34%)。总体而言,我们的研究表明,基于绩效的合同对专业精神的影响是不明确的。更具体地说,使用严格的时间注册规则与较低级别的自治有关,而使用成本效率措施似乎不会影响自治(H1)。基于绩效的签约对家庭护理人员的工作水平没有影响,因为所衡量的两个签约维度均未直接或间接与内在工作满意度相关(H1,H2)。在研究基于绩效的合同时,必须考虑管理者的角色,因为人们认为更高的管理支持与管理者较少使用频繁的严格时间登记规则和成本效益措施(H3)有关。我们对支持性管理人员对于自治和工作满意度(H4)的重要性的了解可以帮助家庭护理组织提高家庭护理工作的吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号