首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Psychiatric Advance Directives as a complex and multistage intervention: A realist systematic review
【24h】

Psychiatric Advance Directives as a complex and multistage intervention: A realist systematic review

机译:作为复杂多阶段干预措施的精神病学预先指示:现实的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Psychiatric Advance Directives (PADs) are documents that allow users with severe and chronic mental illnesses to notify their treatment preferences for future crisis relapses and to appoint a surrogate decision-maker for a period of incompetence. Despite many supposed clinical and organisational benefits, their take-up rate has remained very low and their clinical evaluation has given contradictory results for organisational outcomes. Intermediary results are available, however, which rely on different theoretical views about how PADs are supposed to work. We carried out a realist systematic review that considered the PAD as a multistage intervention including the definition of the document, its completion and its access and honouring. We identified the theoretical frameworks underlying this kind of intervention and examined the available evidence that supported or contradicted the expectations at each stage of the intervention. Forty-seven references were retrieved, ranging from 1996 to 2009. Three frameworks underlie a PAD intervention: enhancement of the autonomy of the user, improvement of the therapeutic alliance and integration of care through partnership working. Although designed in the first place with a view to sustaining the user's autonomy, results indicate that the intervention is more efficient within a therapeutic alliance framework. Moreover, much is known about the completion process and the content of the document, but very little about its access and honouring. The mixture of expectations makes the purpose of PADs unclear, for example, crisis relapse prevention or management, advance planning of long-term or emergency care, or reduction in the resort to coercion. This may explain their low take-up rates. Hence, frameworks and purpose have to be clarified. The shape of the whole intervention at each stage relies on such clarification. More research is needed, particularly on the later stages of the intervention, as the evidence for how PADs should be implemented is still incomplete.
机译:精神病学超前指令(PAD)是允许患有严重和慢性精神疾病的用户通知其治疗偏好以应对未来的危机复发,并在无能为力期间任命替代决策者的文件。尽管有许多临床和组织上的益处,但他们的接受率仍然很低,并且他们的临床评估结果与组织结果相矛盾。但是,可以得到中间结果,这些结果依赖于关于PAD如何工作的不同理论观点。我们进行了现实的系统审查,认为PAD是一个多阶段的干预措施,包括文档的定义,文档的完成,获取和使用。我们确定了这种干预的基础理论框架,并研究了在干预的每个阶段支持或与预期相抵触的现有证据。从1996年到2009年,共检索了47个参考文献。PAD干预是三个框架的基础:增强用户的自主权,改善治疗联盟以及通过伙伴关系工作实现医疗整合。尽管最初是为了维持用户的自主权而设计的,但结果表明,干预在治疗联盟框架内更为有效。此外,对于完成过程和文档的内容知之甚少,但对文件的访问和获取却知之甚少。期望的混合使得对PAD的目的不清楚,例如,预防或管理危机复发,长期或紧急护理的预先计划或减少诉诸胁迫。这可以解释他们的低摄取率。因此,必须明确框架和目的。每个阶段的整体干预方式取决于这种澄清。需要进行更多的研究,尤其是在干预的后期阶段,因为有关如何实施PAD的证据仍然不完整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号